Learning Evidence Scientific Creation Special Events

NON SI DEVONO CUMULARE PENSIONI E STIPENDI DELLO STATO PER OLTRE 10000 EURO ] È FDI PROSEGUIRÀ BATTAGLIA DI CIVILTÀ. «Sconcertante affermazione oggi dell’Inps in Commissione Lavoro alla Camera. Nell’ambito della battaglia contro le pensioni d’oro che Fratelli d’Italia sta portando avanti da anni in Parlamento, avevamo chiesto all’Inps di dirci senza reticenze se lo Stato è o meno in possesso dei dati relativi ai versamenti contributivi degli italiani. Oggi in Parlamento è stata certificata dall’Inps l’aberrazione di uno Stato allo sbando, che paga 270 miliardi di euro l’anno, il 33% della spesa pubblica complessiva in pensioni, senza conoscere la storia contributiva degli italiani, nemmeno di quei privilegiati che percepiscono pensioni da capogiro che arrivano anche a 90 mila euro al mese. È una vergogna inaudita, indegna di una Nazione progredita, figlia degli anni della politica più squallida della Prima Repubblica. Tutto questo non fermerà Fratelli d’Italia nella sua battaglia per revocare le pensioni d’oro e anzi questo scandalo rappresenta un’ulteriore spinta per andare avanti in quella che consideriamo una battaglia di civiltà e di equità intergenerazionale. Pertanto modificheremo la nostra proposta di legge, che ad oggi prevede di fissare un tetto a 5 mila euro, di ricalcolare la parte che supera questo tetto col metodo contributivo e di tagliare la parte che non è coperta dai contributi versati. E presenteremo la nuova ipotesi già nei prossimi giorni, auspicando che ci sia da parte di tutti i partiti politici la disponibilità a ragionare seriamente e concretamente su questo tema». Lo dichiara il presidente di Fratelli d’Italia, Giorgia Meloni, a margine dell’audizione dei rappresentanti dell’Inps in Commissione Lavoro alla Camera sulle proposte di legge sulle pensioni d’oro.


In Yemen raid sauditi su un mercato, almeno 65 morti.] [ se, ISLAM non fosse strumentalizzato dalla Sharia? Certo, potrebbe diventare una Religione di PACE, ma SI DEVE AGIRE IN FRETTA, prima che sia troppo tardi, e si debba essere costretti ad amputare l'arto andato in cancrena dal corpo sociale del Genere umano! OGGI COME OGGI L'ISLAM PUò ESSERE SOLTANTO L'ORRORE, NAZISMO, VIOLAZIONE DI TUTTI I DIRITTI UMANI, SOLTANTO IL TERRORE, TERRORISMO ED I DELITTI POSSONO TENERE UNITA LA LEGA ARABA. In Yemen raid sauditi su un mercato, almeno 65 morti. Due operazioni lanciate da cacciai su un mercato affollato nel nordest dello Yemen. Lo riferisce l'agenzia di Stato Saba, controllata dai ribelli Houthi. Altre 55 persone sono rimaste ferite. Due operazioni lanciate da cacciai su un mercato affollato nel nordest dello Yemen. Lo riferisce l'agenzia di Stato Saba, controllata dai ribelli Houthi. Altre 55 persone sono rimaste ferite.


dove si viene uccisi, se trovati in possesso di un Vangelo, e dove (aule scolastiche) non si esita a far sparire il Crocifisso (simbolo dei Valori di uno Stato Laico) per non turbare la sensibilità degli islamici! ] NON SI TRATTA PIù DI CREDERE O DI NON CREDERE IN DIO, QUI SI TRATTA DI ESTINGUERCI COME POPOLO, DI ESSERE DIVENTATI IL NULLA, CHE VERRà ISLAMICAMENTE O NICHILISTICAMENTE COLONIZZATO! LA MASSONERIA INGLESE HA DECISO DI ANNIENTARE IL CRISTIANESIMO, E LA FAMIGLIA NATURALE A LIVELLO MONDIALE! PERCHé GLI ISLAMICI? LORO NON HANNO UNA FAMIGLIA NATURALE! [ Un asilo comunale dice addio alla festa del papà per non offendere i bambini con due mamme. A denunciare quanto accaduto in una scuola per l'infanzia del quartiere Isola di Milano è Riccardo De Corato, ex vice sindaco e capolista di Fratelli d'Italia alle Comunali 2016. "Un asilo comunale elimina la Festa del Papà per non offendere i genitori gay: siamo arrivati anche a questo a Milano, dopo che l'amministrazione arancione ha cancellato mamma e papà per genitore1 e genitore2". Non ci sarà alcuna iniziativa legata alla Festa del Papà (dai bigliettini di auguri alla canzoncina da imparare a memoria) per non discriminare i figli di eventuali coppie 'arcobaleno'. "Non c'è più alcun rispetto per la famiglia - aggiunge De Corato - non è certo una novità per il centrosinistra, sia a livello nazionale che locale, ma non ci arrendiamo, non lo accettiamo. L'assessorato ha precisato che è stata una scelta autonoma delle educatrici, ma la scuola è comunale, non è accettabile che ognuno faccia quello che gli pare! Se la linea del Comune è quella di far fare a ogni educatrice quello che vuole, allora prepariamoci all'anarchia di ogni singola maestra. Palazzo Marino non può lavarsene le mani così, presenterò un'interrogazione". I genitori riferiscono che la festa del papà è stata sostituita con una programmazione didattica dedicata alle diverse etnie. Sui motivi che hanno portato a questo cambiamento non ci sono al momento versioni ufficiali, anche se molti genitori non sembrano avere dubbi: sarebbe stato deciso per non urtare la sensibilità di alcuni bambini che avrebbero due mamme o due papà. "Non ci sono dubbi che il motivo è questo - ha detto una nonna senza nascondere la sua irritazione - nella classe di mio nipote c'è una bimba che vive con due mamme, ma gli altri genitori si stanno organizzando per chiedere alla scuola di rivedere la sua decisione".


il Governo ERDOGAN si dice una Democrazia, ed invece, è diventato un potere teocratico imperialistico islamico, che fa così paura anche ai suoi consiglieri, che, loro possono soltanto assecondarlo! ERDOGAN ELIMINANDO LE OPPOSIZIONI SI è CHIUSO IN UNA MONADE PERICOLOSA! Unius REI, al contrario è una MONARCHIA assoluta, senza un obiettivo geopolitico, che ascolterà tutti gli uomini di buona volontà del pianeta, perché, lo scopo unico è la fratellanza universale, dove tutti dobbiamo essere felici, e dove tutti devono evitare di far soffrire persone innocenti!


I Am Anonymous - Message To The UniusRei3: TheDemonDack  https://youtu.be/m8UH96qsFoA ] [ CIAkillYourTubexIMF 4 anni fa ] ANSWER: ragazzo: tu finirai per tagliarti il pisello: con quel giocattolo! ] SONO ROVINATO  [ SONO ROVINATO GOOGLE BLOGGER SPA NWO 666 SPA FED, HA COSPARSO DI UN COLORE AZZURRO, TUTTO IL MIO TESTO, ED IO RITENGO CHE, QUESTO POSSA ESCLUDERE I MIEI ARTICOLI DAI MOTORI DI RICERCA! A UN CERTO PUNTO, ANCHE SE CANCELLO TUTTI I COOCHIES MI IMPEDISCE COMUNQUE DI CANCELLARE GLI ARTICOLI SPAM!


QUESTA GROTTESCA SITUAZIONE ECONOMICA SI COMMENTA DA SE! ASPETTANO DI POTER PRENDERE PER DISPERAZIONE E FAME QUEST'UOMO EROE! Uno degli incarichi più difficili nel mondo occidentale, quello di primo ministro di Israele, non é eccessivamente ben remunerato. Lo ha reso noto lo stesso premier Benyamin Netanyahu che sulla propria pagina Facebook ha pubblicato il suo stipendio per il mese di febbraio: al netto, 17.645 shekel, circa 4.100 euro. I giovani israeliani che lavorano nel hi-tech, é stato notato, possano aspettarsi guadagni ben superiori. In realtà il suo stipendio lordo sarebbe di quasi 50mila euro, ma i prelievi sono significativi: non solo l'imposta sul reddito (48%) e la previdenza sociale, ma anche - e questo sembra essere il tasto più 'sofferto' - una detrazione di 12.440 shekel come contributo per l'automobile blindata con cui é costretto a spostarsi per volere dei servizi di sicurezza. Netanyahu, secondo Maariv, ha utilizzato la pubblicazione su Facebook proprio per fare pressione sui funzionari statali affinché lo equiparino al capo dello Stato Reuven Rivlin che é invece esonerato da quella detrazione.


TANTO PEGGIO TANTO MEGLIO, HANNO DETTO I MASSONI ANGLO-AMERICANI FARISEI ANTICRISTO MERKEL, CHE HANNO DECISO DI ISLAMIZZARE LA EUROPA! “La UE ha fatto concessioni alla Turchia oltre il senso comune del pudore”. 16.03.2016( Bruxelles è andata al di là di tutti gli standard di decenza i merito alle concessioni a beneficio della Turchia a seguito della crisi migratoria, ha affermato il rappresentante permanente della Russia presso la UE Vladimir Chizhov. "Penso che la UE sia andata oltre il senso comune del pudore sulle concessioni alla Turchia. In questo caso, come si suol dire, sembrano sbiaditi i cosiddetti valori comuni dell'Unione Europea, che i nostri partner spesso raccomandano e in alcune situazioni cercano di imporre. Stanno diventando sempre più attuali quanto la posizione dell'Unione Europea sia di principio e quanto l'Europa per il bene dei suoi interessi politici lasci da parte o addirittura sacrifichi i suoi valori", — ha detto Chizhov durante una videoconferenza con l'agenzia russa di stampa internazionale "Rossiya Segodnya".
L'accordo discusso tra la UE e la Turchia per affrontare la crisi migratoria prevede che Ankara si riprenderà tutti i migranti ad eccezione dei profughi che sono arrivati in Grecia transitando dal territorio turco. In cambio Ankara riceverà l'accelerazione dei negoziati sulla liberalizzazione dei visti e dei negoziati per l'adesione alla UE, così come 3 miliardi di euro. Al vertice UE-Turchia del 7 marzo i rappresentanti di Ankara avevano richiesto di aumentare del doppio l'assistenza finanziaria della UE per migliorare l'accoglienza dei profughi in territorio turco: http://it.sputniknews.com/politica/20160316/2286151/Chizhov-Russia-Profughi-Immigrazione-Valori.html#ixzz434bL3Mof


I TURCHI SONO VIGLIACCHI E SCIACALLI, PRIMA HANNO PUGNALATO ALLE SPALLE CON IL TERRORISMO, ED ORA CHE, LA SIRIA NON SI PUÒ DIFENDERE LA VANNO A DEPREDARE, E VANNO A COMMETTERE ATTI DI BULLISMO, DELITTI? GLI ISLAMICI SONO SEMPRE STATI COSÌ! Russia, Lavrov accusa la Turchia: viola la sovranità di Siria ed Iraq. 16.03.2016( La Turchia viola la sovranità e l'integrità territoriale dei Paesi confinanti di Iraq e Siria, ha dichiarato il ministro degli Esteri russo Sergey Lavrov in una conferenza stampa a Mosca. "Certo è terribile quando qualche violazione dei diritti umani si registra nel quadro di conflitti interni. Ma non è meno grave quando si verificano violazioni della sovranità e dell'integrità territoriale degli altri Stati," — ritiene Lavrov.
"Purtroppo la Turchia rientra in questa categoria. Sappiamo le operazioni delle forze armate turche in Iraq, così come dei bombardamenti dal territorio turco contro le posizioni delle milizie curde in Siria", — ha aggiunto il capo della diplomazia russa.
"Per l'intervento turco in Iraq e l'ingerenza nei suoi affari interni è stata presa ad hoc una decisione della Lega Araba", — ha ricordato Lavrov. http://it.sputniknews.com/politica/20160316/2286511/Confini-difesa-sicurezza.html#ixzz434dNlau1


QUESTA SENTENZA È semplicemente insensata, ridicola, è DA MANICOMIO CRIMINALE, INFATTI, NON È CREDIBILE SUL PIANO RAZIONALE! Occidente e Corea del Nord sono entrambi l'ANTICRISTO! ENTRAMBI VOGLIONO INFANGARE GESÙ CRISTO CHE NON HA FATTO DEL MALE A NESSUNO! NON È UMANO DARE TANTI ANNI DI CARCERE A UN CRETINO! Secondo la sentenza, lo studente avrebbe realizzato un atto ostile contro lo Stato cercando di sottrarre un manifesto con uno slogan politico da una zona riservata al personale dell'hotel. Nella sua confessione del 29 febbraio, Warmbier ha dichiarato di aver agito su ordine di una chiesta protestante dell'Ohio e di essere stato sostenuto da un gruppo universitario per "danneggiare la motivazioni e l'etiva di lavoro del popolo coreano" e per "insultare nel nome dell'Occidente" la Corea del Nord. Inoltre, ha affermato che la Cia era a conoscenza della sua 'missione' e ha fatto riferimento a un presunto piano di Washington per danneggiare la Corea del Nord attraverso la chiesta metodista. La pena a 15 anni di lavori forzati è la stessa che ha ricevuto il missionario Kennteh Bar, lo statunitense che è rimasto più a lungo in Corea del Nord, più di due anni, fino alla sua liberazione nel novembre del 2014. La Corte suprema nordcoreana ha condannato Otto Warmbier, cittadino americano e studente di 21 anni della University of Virginia, a 15 anni di lavori forzati perché, riconosciuto colpevole di "atti ostili" contro lo Stato. I media del Nord annunciarono il suo arresto il 22 gennaio a causa dell'ingresso "in veste di turista con lo scopo di condurre attività criminali contro lo Stato e con la tacita connivenza del governo Usa e sotto la sua manipolazione".


I SATANISTI MASSONI CI HANNO PORTATO A DIVENTARE ALLEATI DEI NOSTRI NEMICI GIURATI GLI ISLAMICI NAZISTI, ED AMICI DEI NOSTRI FRATELLI NATURALI RUSSI E CINESI ]( NOI ABBIAMO PERSO IL CONTROLLO DELLA NOSTRA VITA, SIAMO IN TOTALE BALIA DI FARISEI SATANISTI MASSONI E LORO SALAFITI ) [ In Spagna petizione al Parlamento contro l'accordo UE-Turchia, Diverse organizzazioni non governative spagnole hanno trasmesso una petizione al Congresso dei Deputati (camera bassa del Parlamento iberico) con oltre 100mila firme per chiedere al governo di non supportare l'accordo legato alla crisi migratoria tra la UE e la Turchia. "Questo accordo, se sarà supportato dalla Spagna, potrebbe costituire la base per gravi violazioni dei diritti umani e il mancato rispetto da parte della Spagna dei suoi obblighi internazionali… L'UE viola alcuni principi fondamentali del diritto internazionale, se ratificherà l'accordo proposto dalla Turchia," — si legge nella petizione
"Raccogliere un numero di firme così grande in poco tempo, solo 6 giorni, è la dimostrazione che la società civile spagnola è fortemente contraria a questo accordo immorale e illegale. La Spagna deve rispondere ai sentimenti dei cittadini e bloccare l'accordo tra la UE e la Turchia," — ha detto il rappresentante della Ong "Oxfam Intermon" contro la povertà Jaime Atienza.
Oggi in Spagna in decine di città si sono svolte manifestazioni di protesta contro l'accordo tra Bruxelles e Ankara. In alcune città spagnole, in particolare a Barcellona, le autorità locali hanno ordinato di abbassare a mezz'asta le bandiere UE per dimostrare la forte opposizione a questo accordo.
http://it.sputniknews.com/mondo/20160316/2289214/Profughi-Valori-Immigrazione-Barcellona.html#ixzz435XSsIO6


SIAMO TUTTI MINACCIATI DA UNA PARANOIA SCHIZOFRENICA: IL SATANISMO REGIME MASSONICO BIDENBERG SENZA SOVRANITÀ MONETARIA! Patrick MurphyUsa, Murphy: Dobbiamo essere pronti a fronteggiare un'aggressione militare russa 16.03.2016( NOI ABBIAMO PERSO IL CONTROLLO DELLA NOSTRA VITA, SIAMO IN TOTALE BALIA DI FARISEI SATANISTI MASSONI E LORO SALAFITI ) Lo ha affermato il segretario esecutivo della Difesa con delega all'Esercito, Patrick Murphy, durante un'audizione alla commissione Forze armate del Senato Usa. Un elemento critico della preparazione dell'Esercito statunitense è quello della prontezza a combattere le forze russe. "Il nostro esercito deve essere preparato ad affrontare la forza da combattimento avanzata e di fascia alta di una Russia aggressiva — ha spiegato —, o più probabilmente, di un'aggressione russa che impiega attori surrogati". A questo proposito, il segretario ha aggiunto che nei 121,5 miliardi di dollari richiesti per il bilancio 2017, si sta ipotecando il futuro di questa prontezza. L'obiettivo è mantenere i livelli attuali e di continuare parallelamente a combattere il terrorismo. Dal dipartimento della Difesa sono aumentate le preoccupazioni circa quella che si ritiene sia un'aggressione da parte della Russia. Mosca ha ripetutamente rifiutato le accuse, definite inaccettabili e un tentativo di dipingere il paese come un nemico.
Inoltre, la Russia ha avvisato che ammassare militari ed equipaggiamenti americani e della Nato vicino ai suoi confini è provocatorio e contrario agli accordi raggiunti in precedenza, nonché può causare destabilizzazione a livello regionale e globale: http://it.sputniknews.com/mondo/20160316/2289250/usa-pronti-a-aggressione-militare-russa.html#ixzz435Wp6M9J


CON questo MODO DI PARLARE, ERDOGAN DICHIARA DA SE STESSO, DI ESSERE oggi il più PERICOLOSO NAZISTA islamico terrorista CRIMINALE INTERNAZIONALE! ISTANBUL, 16 MAR - "Molti Paesi e molte forze sperano che la Turchia si pieghi in ginocchio e si arrenda. È questo che c'è dietro gli attacchi terroristici" che hanno colpito il Paese in questi mesi. Lo ha detto il presidente turco Recep Tayyip Erdogan, attaccando anche la stampa internazionale per aver sostenuto che il Paese può essere stabilizzato solo rimuovendolo.


attraverso, la manipolazione di una immagine (hanno disegnato le corna sul mio nome), circa: una pergamena fatta dai miei alunni delle medie inferiori in mio onore, io posso dimostrare che gli agenti della CIA hanno manipolato i miei 110 blogspot!


ALLORA, io prendo atto che, voi avete paura di me, e che nessuno mi vuole parlare! QUINDI, AVETE MENO PAURA DELLA GUERRA MONDIALE NUCLEARE, CHE NON DI PARLARE CON ME! https://www.youtube.com/user/YouTube/discussion


FORZA PUTIN NOI SIAMO ORGOGLIOSI DI TE! ] [ “Con la Russia, in guerra. L’America è contorta, l’Europa balbetta, Mosca ha le idee chiare: l’Isis va spazzato via” 18 settembre 2015 di Giorgia Meloni. 18 settembre 2015, pubblicato da “Il Foglio”. “La priorità oggi è la necessaria unione delle forze contro il terrorismo. Senza di questa è impossibile risolvere altri problemi urgenti, come quello dei migranti”. Vladimir Putin sintetizza così la posizione russa in Siria, il suo sostegno a Bashar el Assad, l’urgenza di muovere guerra all’Isis e la soluzione al problema dell’esodo biblico che sta investendo l’Europa. Sono d’accordo con lui. Per spiegare la posizione degli Stati Uniti, invece, non possono bastare due righe, nemmeno a un grande comunicatore come Barack Obama, perché la strategia americana in medio oriente è molto più complessa. Talmente contorta, in verità, che il presidente americano sta trovando grandi difficoltà a spiegarla perfino in Patria. C’è la ferma volontà di fare fuori Assad: è un crudele dittatore, è amico di Mosca (alla quale concede l’utilizzo della base navale di Tartus), è sciita alawita e filo iraniano e pertanto inviso agli Stati sunniti, Turchia e Arabia Saudita in testa, storici alleati statunitensi. Il problema è che nel gioco del “nemico del mio nemico”, gli Stati Uniti rischiano di ritrovarsi per amici i tagliagole dell’Isis. Perché il tentativo di sostituire Assad con il vento fresco delle primavere arabe è fallito miseramente e oggi, sul campo, il califfato è l’unico vero antagonista del regime siriano. Così, mentre la Casa Bianca cerca il bandolo della matassa, la coalizione internazionale contro l’Isis si limita a timidi e inefficaci bombardamenti, rivolti per lo più a sostenere gli alleati curdi o a fermare l’avanzata jihadista verso Baghdad. Nel frattempo continuano ad arrivare allo Stato islamico soldi, armi, uomini e mezzi, in modo più o meno clandestino, senza che nessuno cerchi il modo per impedirlo. Mentre a Washington tentano di trovare un piano B, l’Isis conquista terreno in Siria e Iraq, è arrivato in Egitto e controlla diverse città della Libia ad appena “400 chilometri da noi”, come ha dovuto ricordare Papa Francesco. E nei territori conquistati, questi fanatici islamici sterminano le minoranze etniche e religiose, soprattutto cristiane, distruggono templi e monumenti, riducono in schiavitù le donne e i bambini. E sono la causa della fuga di milioni di disperati che premono ai confini europei e rischiano di stravolgere le nostre società. E allora, la priorità per gli europei è una sola: spazzare via l’Isis dalla faccia della terra. In Iraq, in Siria, in Libia, in Nigeria, ovunque questi assassini hanno alzato le loro bandiere. Con tutta la forza che sarà necessaria. Senza perdere altro tempo, senza tentennamenti, senza calcoli e senza sotterfugi. Anche al fianco dei russi, anche sostenendo l’esercito siriano di Assad. Possibilmente insieme ai nostri alleati americani. In ogni caso a difesa del nostro interesse nazionale. Il nostro presidente del Consiglio Matteo Renzi ha dichiarato che l’Italia non parteciperà agli eventuali attacchi aerei contro il califfato IN Siria che Francia e Regno Unito stanno attualmente valutando. Le ha definite inutili “iniziative spot” e potrebbe anche non avere tutti i torti. Il medio oriente e il nord Africa non si pacificano con qualche incursione aerea. È necessaria una azione militare a vasto raggio contro l’Isis e serve una strategia comune con le altre nazioni che stanno combattendo la nostra stessa guerra. Sono argomentazioni che l’Italia può portare in seno all’Unione europea e in seno alle Nazioni Unite, anche grazie al peso che dovrebbe avere la lady PesCe Federica Mogherini (la cui nomina ha comportato, per l’Italia, dover sostenere le folli sanzioni contro la Russia). Ciò che l’Italia non può permettersi, invece, è tirarsi fuori dalla partita, nascondere la testa sotto la sabbia invocando la “necessità di una soluzione politica” e sperare che altri facciano tutto il lavoro al posto nostro. http://www.fratelli-italia.it/2015/09/18/con-la-russia-in-guerra-lamerica-e-contorta-leuropa-balbetta-mosca-ha-le-idee-chiare-lisis-va-spazzato-via/


QUESTI SONO I VALORI EBRAICO CRISTIANI, E PER TROVARE UN ALTRA SOCIETà CHE SIA STATA MIGLIORE DELLA NOSTRA VOI DOVETE RISALIRE ALLA ESPERIENZA DI SODOMA E GOMORRA! «Difendere il diritto di un bambino di avere un padre e una madre e tutelare la dignità della donna contro la pratica disumana dell’utero in affitto sono due battaglie che devono contraddistinguere il centrodestra e l’alternativa al Governo di sinistra guidato da Renzi e Alfano. Il centrodestra deve tornare ad essere unito anche su valori e battaglie dirimenti come quella per la difesa della famiglia, dopo che ha saputo farlo bene sui temi economici con la battaglia parlamentare contro la legge di stabilità. Per questo rivolgo un appello a Forza Italia e Lega Nord: creiamo un fronte parlamentare che dica no alla stepchild adoption, alle adozioni gay e all’utero in affitto e sappia battersi per rimettere la famiglia e la natalità al centro dell’agenda politica». Lo dichiara il presidente di Fratelli d’Italia, Giorgia Meloni.


Obama DATAGATE CIA FED IS masonic system NWO ] [ in realtà, ovviamente, noi siamo la democrazia, quindi, non esiste tra di noi un problema democratico, se voi avete delle ragioni oggettive, da far valere contro di me pubblicamente!


Obama DATAGATE CIA FED IS masonic system NWO ] [ ma, come potrebbero, le vostre streghe, e i vostri sacerdoti di satana, venire in vostro aiuto, se, loro non hanno chi li può aiutare?


Behold, I will curse you antichrist! In fact, this year you will die! DRINK YOUR POISON MADE BY YOURSELF

SATANA DARWIN GENDER lobby ] se ti vai ad irritare le emorroidi? poi, è normale che ti bebbano bruciare, è così che si brucia il fiore dei tuoi
anni!


hindu council Yoga Indian elections


Blogger Visit Us Displays, Location & Visitor Info. About Us History & Director Calendar Events & Lectures Biblical Principles & Learning Evidence Scientific Evidence for Creation Special Events Director's Lecture Series (June) Series Title: “Wonders of Creation..Soaring in Splendor" Day: First Saturday of Every Month Time: Starts at 11:00 am and again at 2:00 pm Dinosaur Excavations Creation Evidence Museum will be holding the annual Public Excavation. Experience the fun of a real archilogical excivation. For information see below. Excavation Details, Registration and Liabilty Waiver Day & Time: June 29th - July 3rd from 8:00 am - 1:00 pm Brunei Central african republic Convert Egypt Eritrea Eu Flees Forb Iran Iraq Libya Maldives Myanmar North korea Pakistan Raid Research Sharia Somalia Sudan Syria World watch list Yemen Oggi attorno alla famiglia e alla vita si svolge la lotta fondamentale della dignita' dell'uomo. (Papa Giovanni Paolo II a Rio de Janeiro il 3.10.1997 in preparazione al II incontro mondiale delle famiglie).@ YHWH - the man has become unstable and unreliable, as says "loveallfan4" that he expected a man "machine", make by:Satan enlightened of IMF-World Order: Masonic) who has murdered, the sense of God and a sense of national self-that: is collapsed, the identity: individual and collective, as a result: the absolute crime of "bank seigniorage" (IMF) which is: the foundation: 1. Institutional 2. Social 3. relationships, of all men on the planet. 4. now reduced to a single, herd of animals (as the racist nationalism? not is identity!) in this dull companies: Universal, which is Masonic, which is the NWO. a decadent humanity that yearns for its self-destruction ... locked into positions selfish egocentric schizophrenic and desperate ... So what? the word is to arms! the slaughter of mankind? has begun! @elite leaders - you will not want to believe, to all the bullshit of the religion? really: you will be so naive? but, you really think: that: alms, or prayers, or sacrifices: they can have: some value: when at its foundation: there is no justice? Jesus said: "Whoever would save his life? Lose it!": "You can not serve two masters!" Who does not hate his life in this world will lose it ".. here's why: if you not risk your life .. for, you have to leave: 666 rothscild Kabbalah, Talmud 322 bush: and come and not see me immediately! but even the old testament says the same thing: the very first commandment! @ Freemasons, Satanists Illuminati: seigniorage banking Sharia communist political elites leading media executives: - 666 Kabbalah: Talmud 322: - but, what do you expect? that God would never lead: to you: your account: for all your crimes?: for being a traitor: of his Kingdom? lol. However, I have good news: it's good for you! "All your relatives? are all in the infinite anguish: in an abyss of despair, and destruction without remedy: your father's house: Satan, hell, but, you still do not: that is, you're not still there gone! " @ Jews - no longer: to Rothschild: that you must watch! because: he's damaged the cane: that: when you support: for making pressure on it?: then: breaks "collapse IMF": becoming a sharp weapon: and you pierce the hand: piercing it, this is the time: that: you look to your King: lorenzojhwh Unius REI .. about the fact that I am not jew? this is a false problem, since there are many examples in the Bible, of the goyim, who powerfully: has delivered and blessed Israel. first: of all: Melchizedek: o: Malki-tzédek מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶק: / :מַלְכִּי־צָדֶק: "Il mio Re è giusto". those who speak against me? is like Lucifer, who, he said: "You can do better." lol. yes, but then became Satan! My detractor? is like: Adam.. lol. but, then, he has lost his "paradise earth": making: downgrade: regress: in sin and in death! but, as can be: not have an exemplary punishment, the denigrating : of Unius Rei? Which of my enemies will not receive the "well served" by God "? when you will hit? So, you say: "Lord I believe: forgiveness mercy: for me!" @ kakam - you resign! If this ugly story of the IMF: I do not close it: peacefully? would be closed anyway: in a dramatic way! God has said: "Enough!"" enough! with all these stupid wars: about the religion! we give to all this: the final cut: who does the relione? He comes out of politics! @Benjamin Netanyahu:FROM:"IsraelNational­TV"- Satanism of the Talmud? exceed: enormously: the ideology of Satanism itself: why says that all men are animals evolved: while: the Talmud: of Our masters: Illuminati: IMF: says that men: are only them, while all others: are only animals in human form: these fools Rabbis Kakam of Enlightened? have the resources: and the power to put the micro-chip at all: their animals (goyim) to do of: the whole: human race, one only: bunch of slaves! Well I know that, all the political, you're only clowns: puppetry: all prostitutes of Fund: at sold all souls to hell: in the Freemasons .. But: I swear in the name of the living God: You do not have tears and despair: you can imagine, if you: with all the other politicians in the world will not find: a solution to this: IMF: and for what: that: I can understand? the solution can be: only: the Kingdom of Unius Rei!talmud By: Benjamin H. Freedman http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/factsR4.html THE TALMUD on Christians "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians," was written by Rev. I.B. Pranaitis, Master of Theology and Professor of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Old St. Petersburg, Russia. The Rev. Pranaitis was the greatest of the students of the Talmud. His complete command of the Hebrew language qualified him to analyze the Talmud as few men in history. The Rev. Pranaitis scrutinized the Talmud for passages referring to Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith. These passages were translated by him into Latin. Hebrew lends itself to translation into Latin better than it does directly into English. The translation of the passages of the Talmud referring to Jesus, Christians and Christian faith were printed in Latin by the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg in 1893 with the Imprimatur of his Archbishop. The translation from the Latin into English was made by great Latin scholars in the United States in 1939 with funds provided by wealthy Americans for that purpose. In order not to leave any loose ends on the subject of the Talmud's reference to Jesus, to Christians and to the Christian faith I will below summarize translations into English from the Latin texts of Rev. Pranaitis' "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians". It would require too much space to quote these passages verbatim with their foot-notes form the Soncino Edition in English. First I will summarize the references by Rev. Pranaitis referring to Jesus in the Talmud in the original texts translated by him into Latin, and from Latin into English: Sanhedrin, 67a -- Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier Kallah, 1b. (18b) -- Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Sanhedrin, 67a -- Hanged on the eve of Passover. Toldath Jeschu. Birth related in most shameful expressions Abhodah Zarah II -- Referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier. Schabbath XIV. Again referred to as the son of Pandira, the Roman. Sanhedrin, 43a -- On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus. Schabbath, 104b -- Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools. Toldoth Jeschu. Judas and Jesus engaged in quarrel with filth. Sanhedrin, 103a. -- Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self. Sanhedrin, 107b. -- Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel. Zohar III, (282) -- Died like a beast and buried in animal's dirt heap. Hilkoth Melakhim -- Attempted to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus Abhodah Zarah, 21a -- Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted. Orach Chaiim, 113 -- Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus. Iore dea, 150,2 -- Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident. Abhodah Zarah (6a) -- False teachings to worship on first day of Sabbath [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]]The above are a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasoning. The following are a few summarized references to Christians and the Christian faith although not always expressed in exactly that manner. There are eleven names used in the Talmud for non-Talmud followers, by which Christians are meant. Besides Nostrim, from Jesus the Nazarene, Christians are called by all the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-"Jews": Minim, Edom, Abhodan Zarah, Akum. Obhde Elilim, Nokrim, Amme Haarets, Kuthim, Apikorosim, and Goim. Besides supplying the names by which Christians are called in the Talmud, the passages quoted below indicate what kind of people the Talmud pictures the Christians to be, and what the Talmud says about the religious worship of Christians: [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Hilkhoth Maakhaloth -- Christians are idolators, must not associate. Abhodah Zarah (22a) -- Do not associate with gentiles, they shed blood. Iore Dea (153, 2). -- Must not associate with Christians, shed blood. Abhodah Zarah (25b). -- Beware of Christians when walking abroad with them. Orach Chaiim (20, 2). -- Christians disguise themselves to kill Jews. Abhodah Zarah (15b) -- Suggest Christians have sex relations with animals. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Abhodah Zarah (22a) -- Suspect Christians of intercourse with animals. Schabbath (145b) -- Christians unclean because they eat accordingly Abhodah Zarah (22b) -- Christians unclean because they not at Mount Sinai. Iore Dea (198, 48). -- Clean female Jews contaminated meeting Christians. Kerithuth (6b p. 78) -- Jews called men, Christians not called men. Makkoth (7b) -- Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian. Orach Chaiim(225, 10) -- Christians and animals grouped for comparisons. Midrasch Talpioth 225 -- Christians created to minister to Jews always. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Orach Chaiim 57, 6a -- Christians to be pitied more than sick pigs. Zohar II (64b) -- Christian idolators likened to cows and asses. Kethuboth (110b). -- Psalmist compares Christians to unclean beasts. Sanhedrin (74b). Tos. -- Sexual intercourse of Christian like that of beast. Kethuboth (3b) -- The seed of Christian is valued as seed of beast. Kidduschim (68a) -- Christians like the people of an ass. Eben Haezar (44,8) -- Marriages between Christian and Jews null. Zohar (II, 64b) -- Christian birth rate must be diminished materially. Zohar (I, 28b) -- Christian idolators children of Eve's serpent. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Zohar (I, 131a) -- Idolatrous people (Christians) befoul the world. Emek Haschanach(17a) -- Non-Jews' souls come from death and death's shadow. Zohar (I, 46b, 47a) -- Souls of gentiles have unclean divine origins. Rosch Haschanach(17a) -- Non-Jews souls go down to hell. Iore Dea (337, 1). -- Replace dead Christians like lost cow or ass. Iebhammoth (61a) -- Jews called men, but not Christians called men. Abhodah Zarah (14b) T -- Forbidden to sell religious works to Christians Abhodah Zarah (78) -- Christian churches are places of idolatry. Iore Dea (142, 10) -- Must keep far away physically from churches. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Iore Dea (142, 15) -- Must not listen to church music or look at idols Iore Dea (143, 1) -- Must not rebuild homes destroyed near churches. Hilkoth Abh. Zar (10b) -- Jews must not resell broken chalices to Christians. Chullin (91b) -- Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share. Sanhedrin, 58b -- To strike Israelite like slapping face of God. Chagigah, 15b -- A Jew considered good in spite of sins he commits. Gittin (62a) -- Jew stay away from Christian homes on holidays. Choschen Ham. (26,1) -- Jew must not sue before a Christian judge or laws. Choschen Ham (34,19) -- Christian or servant cannot become witnesses. -------------------- [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Iore Dea (112, 1). -- Avoid eating with Christians, breeds familiarity. Abhodah Zarah (35b) -- Do not drink milk from a cow milked by Christian. Iore dea (178, 1) -- Never imitate customs of Christians, even hair-comb. Abhodah Zarah (72b) -- Wine touched by Christians must be thrown away. Iore Dea (120, 1) -- Bought-dishes from Christians must be thrown away. Abhodah Zarah (2a) -- For three days before Christian festivals, avoid all. Abhodah Zarah (78c) -- Festivals of followers of Jesus regarded as idolatry. Iore Dea (139, 1) -- Avoid things used by Christians in their worship. Abhodah Zarah (14b) -- Forbidden to sell Christians articles for worship. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Iore Dea (151,1) H. -- Do not sell water to Christians articles for baptisms. Abhodah Zarah (2a, 1) -- Do not trade with Christians on their feast days. Abhodah Zarah (1,2) -- Now permitted to trade with Christians on such days. Abhodah Zarah (2aT) -- Trade with Christians because they have money to pay. Iore Dea (148, 5) -- If Christian is not devout, may send him gifts. Hilkoth Akum (IX,2) -- Send gifts to Christians only if they are irreligious. Iore Dea (81,7 Ha) -- Christian wet-nurses to be avoided because dangerous. Iore Dea (153, 1 H) -- Christian nurse will lead children to heresy. Iore Dea (155,1). -- Avoid Christian doctors not well known to neighbors. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Peaschim (25a) -- Avoid medical help from idolators, Christians meant. Iore Dea (156,1) -- Avoid Christian barbers unless escorted by Jews. Abhodah Zarah (26a). -- Avoid Christian midwives as dangerous when alone. Zohar (1,25b) -- Those who do good to Christians never rise when dead. Hilkoth Akum (X,6) -- Help needy Christians if it will promote peace. Iore Dea (148, 12H) -- Hide hatred for Christians at their celebrations. Abhodah Zarah (20a) -- Never praise Christians lest it be believed true. Iore Dea (151,14) -- Not allowed to praise Christians to add to glory. Hilkoth Akum (V, 12) -- Quote Scriptures to forbid mention of Christian god. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Iore Dea (146, 15) -- Refer to Christian religious articles with contempt. Iore Dea (147,5) -- Deride Christian religious articles without wishes. Hilkoth Akum (X,5) -- No gifts to Christians, gifts to converts. Iore Dea (151,11) -- Gifts forbidden to Christians, encourages friendship. Iore Dea (335,43) -- Exile for that Jew who sells farm to Christian. Iore Dea (154,2) -- Forbidden to teach a trade to a Christian Babha Bathra (54b) -- Christian property belongs to first person claiming. Choschen Ham(183,7) -- Keep what Christian overpays in error. Choschen Ham(226,1) -- Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Babha Kama (113b) -- It is permitted to deceive Christians. Choschen Ham(183,7) -- Jews must divide what they overcharge Christians. Choschen Ham(156,5) -- Jews must not take Christian customers from Jews. Iore Dea (157,2) H -- May deceive Christians that believe Christian tenets. Abhodah Zarah (54a) --Usury may be practiced upon Christians or apostates. Iore Dea (159,1) -- Usury permitted now for any reason to Christians. Babha Kama (113a) -- Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian. Babha Kama (113b) -- Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians. Kallah (1b, p.18) -- Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Schabbouth Hag. (6d). -- Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording. Zohar (1,160a). -- Jews must always try to deceive Christians. Iore Dea (158,1) -- Do not cure Christians unless it makes enemies. Orach Cahiim (330,2) -- Do not assist Christian's childbirth on Saturday. Choschen Ham.(425,5) -- Unless believes in Torah do not prevent his death. Iore Dea (158,1) -- Christians not enemies must not be saved either. Hilkkoth Akum (X,1) -- Do not save Christians in danger of death. Choschen Ham(386,10) -- A spy may be killed even before he confesses. Abhodah Zorah (26b) -- Apostates to be thrown into well, not rescued. [[but the Talmud is the Word of God?]] Choschen Ham(388,15) -- Kill those who give Israelites' money to Christians Sanhedrin (59a) -- `Prying into Jews' "Law" to get death penalty Hilkhoth Akum(X,2) -- Baptized Jews are to be put to death Iore Dea(158,2)Hag. -- Kill renegades who turn to Christian rituals. Choschen Ham(425,5) -- Those who do not believe in Torah are to be killed. Hilkhoth tesch.III,8 -- Christians and others deny the "Law" of the Torah. Zohar (I,25a) -- Christians are to be destroyed as idolators. Zohar (II,19a) -- Captivity of Jews end when Christian princes die. Zohar (I,219b) -- Princes of Christians are idolators, must die. Obadiam -- When Rome is destroyed, Israel will be redeemed. Abhodah Zarah(26b) T. -- "Even the best of the Goim should be killed." Sepher Or Israel 177b -- If Jew kills Christian commits no sin. Ialkut Simoni (245c) -- Shedding blood of impious offers sacrifice to God. Zohar (II, 43a) -- Extermination of Christians necessary sacrifice. Zohar (L,28b,39a) -- High place in heaven for those who kill idolators. Hilkhoth Akum(X,1) -- Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians. Hilkhoth Akum (X,1) -- Either turn them away from their idols or kill. Hilkhoth Akum (X,7) -- Allow no idolators to remain where Jews are strong. Choschen Ham(388,16) -- All contribute to expense of killing traitor. Pesachim (49b) -- No need of prayers while beheading on Sabbath. Schabbath (118a). -- Prayers to save from punishment of coming Messiah. --------------------------- "To Seek Out That Which was Lost ..." We present this information as a service to our readers ... Its inclusion, Should not be construed as the Authors 'or the Relays' endorsement, of our: Beliefs ... or as our endorsement of Theirs .. The Truth: will stand on it's: own Merit. could resist, at a analyze: historico-critical: all this accusations: against Jesus and his mother? A person dishonored: him could have done: the rabbi ? Accusations about the integrity of his mother, if known, would not have been said and reported: by his contemporaries? Blogger Brunei Central african republic Convert IaHUShUA "To seek out that which was lost..." We present this Information as a Service to our readers... Its inclusion should not be construed as the Authors' or the Relays' endorsement of our Beliefs... or as our endorsement of theirs.. the Truth will stand on it's own Merit. Found at: The RCathList Home Page. (Suprise!) Download file in .txt format... Self extracting 79.2K factsar.exe. "FACTS ARE FACTS" By: Benjamin H. Freedman THE TALMUD on Christians "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians," was written by Rev. I.B. Pranaitis, Master of Theology and Professor of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Old St. Petersburg, Russia. The Rev. Pranaitis was the greatest of the students of the Talmud. His complete command of the Hebrew language qualified him to analyze the Talmud as few men in history. The Rev. Pranaitis scrutinized the Talmud for passages referring to Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith. These passages were translated by him into Latin. Hebrew lends itself to translation into Latin better than it does directly into English. The translation of the passages of the Talmud referring to Jesus, Christians and Christian faith were printed in Latin by the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg in 1893 with the Imprimatur of his Archbishop. The translation from the Latin into English was made by great Latin scholars in the United States in 1939 with funds provided by wealthy Americans for that purpose. In order not to leave any loose ends on the subject of the Talmud's reference to Jesus, to Christians and to the Christian faith I will below summarize translations into English from the Latin texts of Rev. Pranaitis' "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians". It would require too much space to quote these passages verbatim with their foot-notes form the Soncino Edition in English. First I will summarize the references by Rev. Pranaitis referring to Jesus in the Talmud in the original texts translated by him into Latin, and from Latin into English: Sanhedrin, 67a -- Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier Kallah, 1b. (18b) -- Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Sanhedrin, 67a -- Hanged on the eve of Passover. Toldath Jeschu. Birth related in most shameful expressions Abhodah Zarah II -- Referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier. Schabbath XIV. Again referred to as the son of Pandira, the Roman. Sanhedrin, 43a -- On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus. Schabbath, 104b -- Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools. Toldoth Jeschu. Judas and Jesus engaged in quarrel with filth. Sanhedrin, 103a. -- Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self. Sanhedrin, 107b. -- Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel. Zohar III, (282) -- Died like a beast and buried in animal's dirt heap. Hilkoth Melakhim -- Attempted to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus Abhodah Zarah, 21a -- Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted. Orach Chaiim, 113 -- Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus. Iore dea, 150,2 -- Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident. Abhodah Zarah (6a) -- False teachings to worship on first day of Sabbath The above are a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasoning. The following are a few summarized references to Christians and the Christian faith although not always expressed in exactly that manner. There are eleven names used in the Talmud for non-Talmud followers, by which Christians are meant. Besides Nostrim, from Jesus the Nazarene, Christians are called by all the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-"Jews": Minim, Edom, Abhodan Zarah, Akum. Obhde Elilim, Nokrim, Amme Haarets, Kuthim, Apikorosim, and Goim. Besides supplying the names by which Christians are called in the Talmud, the passages quoted below indicate what kind of people the Talmud pictures the Christians to be, and what the Talmud says about the religious worship of Christians: Hilkhoth Maakhaloth -- Christians are idolators, must not associate. Abhodah Zarah (22a) -- Do not associate with gentiles, they shed blood. Iore Dea (153, 2). -- Must not associate with Christians, shed blood. Abhodah Zarah (25b). -- Beware of Christians when walking abroad with them. Orach Chaiim (20, 2). -- Christians disguise themselves to kill Jews. Abhodah Zarah (15b) -- Suggest Christians have sex relations with animals. Abhodah Zarah (22a) -- Suspect Christians of intercourse with animals. Schabbath (145b) -- Christians unclean because they eat accordingly Abhodah Zarah (22b) -- Christians unclean because they not at Mount Sinai. Iore Dea (198, 48). -- Clean female Jews contaminated meeting Christians. Kerithuth (6b p. 78) -- Jews called men, Christians not called men. Makkoth (7b) -- Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian. Orach Chaiim(225, 10) -- Christians and animals grouped for comparisons. Midrasch Talpioth 225 -- Christians created to minister to Jews always. Orach Chaiim 57, 6a -- Christians to be pitied more than sick pigs. Zohar II (64b) -- Christian idolators likened to cows and asses. Kethuboth (110b). -- Psalmist compares Christians to unclean beasts. Sanhedrin (74b). Tos. -- Sexual intercourse of Christian like that of beast. Kethuboth (3b) -- The seed of Christian is valued as seed of beast. Kidduschim (68a) -- Christians like the people of an ass. Eben Haezar (44,8) -- Marriages between Christian and Jews null. Zohar (II, 64b) -- Christian birth rate must be diminished materially. Zohar (I, 28b) -- Christian idolators children of Eve's serpent. Zohar (I, 131a) -- Idolatrous people (Christians) befoul the world. Emek Haschanach(17a) -- Non-Jews' souls come from death and death's shadow. Zohar (I, 46b, 47a) -- Souls of gentiles have unclean divine origins. Rosch Haschanach(17a) -- Non-Jews souls go down to hell. Iore Dea (337, 1). -- Replace dead Christians like lost cow or ass. Iebhammoth (61a) -- Jews called men, but not Christians called men. Abhodah Zarah (14b) T -- Forbidden to sell religious works to Christians Abhodah Zarah (78) -- Christian churches are places of idolatry. Iore Dea (142, 10) -- Must keep far away physically from churches. Iore Dea (142, 15) -- Must not listen to church music or look at idols Iore Dea (143, 1) -- Must not rebuild homes destroyed near churches. Hilkoth Abh. Zar (10b) -- Jews must not resell broken chalices to Christians. Chullin (91b) -- Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share. Sanhedrin, 58b -- To strike Israelite like slapping face of God. Chagigah, 15b -- A Jew considered good in spite of sins he commits. Gittin (62a) -- Jew stay away from Christian homes on holidays. Choschen Ham. (26,1) -- Jew must not sue before a Christian judge or laws. Choschen Ham (34,19) -- Christian or servant cannot become witnesses. Iore Dea (112, 1). -- Avoid eating with Christians, breeds familiarity. Abhodah Zarah (35b) -- Do not drink milk from a cow milked by Christian. Iore dea (178, 1) -- Never imitate customs of Christians, even hair-comb. Abhodah Zarah (72b) -- Wine touched by Christians must be thrown away. Iore Dea (120, 1) -- Bought-dishes from Christians must be thrown away. Abhodah Zarah (2a) -- For three days before Christian festivals, avoid all. Abhodah Zarah (78c) -- Festivals of followers of Jesus regarded as idolatry. Iore Dea (139, 1) -- Avoid things used by Christians in their worship. Abhodah Zarah (14b) -- Forbidden to sell Christians articles for worship. Iore Dea (151,1) H. -- Do not sell water to Christians articles for baptisms. Abhodah Zarah (2a, 1) -- Do not trade with Christians on their feast days. Abhodah Zarah (1,2) -- Now permitted to trade with Christians on such days. Abhodah Zarah (2aT) -- Trade with Christians because they have money to pay. Iore Dea (148, 5) -- If Christian is not devout, may send him gifts. Hilkoth Akum (IX,2) -- Send gifts to Christians only if they are irreligious. Iore Dea (81,7 Ha) -- Christian wet-nurses to be avoided because dangerous. Iore Dea (153, 1 H) -- Christian nurse will lead children to heresy. Iore Dea (155,1). -- Avoid Christian doctors not well known to neighbors. Peaschim (25a) -- Avoid medical help from idolators, Christians meant. Iore Dea (156,1) -- Avoid Christian barbers unless escorted by Jews. Abhodah Zarah (26a). -- Avoid Christian midwives as dangerous when alone. Zohar (1,25b) -- Those who do good to Christians never rise when dead. Hilkoth Akum (X,6) -- Help needy Christians if it will promote peace. Iore Dea (148, 12H) -- Hide hatred for Christians at their celebrations. Abhodah Zarah (20a) -- Never praise Christians lest it be believed true. Iore Dea (151,14) -- Not allowed to praise Christians to add to glory. Hilkoth Akum (V, 12) -- Quote Scriptures to forbid mention of Christian god. Iore Dea (146, 15) -- Refer to Christian religious articles with contempt. Iore Dea (147,5) -- Deride Christian religious articles without wishes. Hilkoth Akum (X,5) -- No gifts to Christians, gifts to converts. Iore Dea (151,11) -- Gifts forbidden to Christians, encourages friendship. Iore Dea (335,43) -- Exile for that Jew who sells farm to Christian. Iore Dea (154,2) -- Forbidden to teach a trade to a Christian Babha Bathra (54b) -- Christian property belongs to first person claiming. Choschen Ham(183,7) -- Keep what Christian overpays in error. Choschen Ham(226,1) -- Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew. Babha Kama (113b) -- It is permitted to deceive Christians. Choschen Ham(183,7) -- Jews must divide what they overcharge Christians. Choschen Ham(156,5) -- Jews must not take Christian customers from Jews. Iore Dea (157,2) H -- May deceive Christians that believe Christian tenets. Abhodah Zarah (54a) --Usury may be practiced upon Christians or apostates. Iore Dea (159,1) -- Usury permitted now for any reason to Christians. Babha Kama (113a) -- Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian. Babha Kama (113b) -- Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians. Kallah (1b, p.18) -- Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience. Schabbouth Hag. (6d). -- Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording. Zohar (1,160a). -- Jews must always try to deceive Christians. Iore Dea (158,1) -- Do not cure Christians unless it makes enemies. Orach Cahiim (330,2) -- Do not assist Christian's childbirth on Saturday. Choschen Ham.(425,5) -- Unless believes in Torah do not prevent his death. Iore Dea (158,1) -- Christians not enemies must not be saved either. Hilkkoth Akum (X,1) -- Do not save Christians in danger of death. Choschen Ham(386,10) -- A spy may be killed even before he confesses. Abhodah Zorah (26b) -- Apostates to be thrown into well, not rescued. Choschen Ham(388,15) -- Kill those who give Israelites' money to Christians Sanhedrin (59a) -- `Prying into Jews' "Law" to get death penalty Hilkhoth Akum(X,2) -- Baptized Jews are to be put to death Iore Dea(158,2)Hag. -- Kill renegades who turn to Christian rituals. Choschen Ham(425,5) -- Those who do not believe in Torah are to be killed. Hilkhoth tesch.III,8 -- Christians and others deny the "Law" of the Torah. Zohar (I,25a) -- Christians are to be destroyed as idolators. Zohar (II,19a) -- Captivity of Jews end when Christian princes die. Zohar (I,219b) -- Princes of Christians are idolators, must die. Obadiam -- When Rome is destroyed, Israel will be redeemed. Abhodah Zarah(26b) T. -- "Even the best of the Goim should be killed." Sepher Or Israel 177b -- If Jew kills Christian commits no sin. Ialkut Simoni (245c) -- Shedding blood of impious offers sacrifice to God. Zohar (II, 43a) -- Extermination of Christians necessary sacrifice. Zohar (L,28b,39a) -- High place in heaven for those who kill idolators. Hilkhoth Akum(X,1) -- Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians Hilkhoth Akum (X,1) -- Either turn them away from their idols or kill. Hilkhoth Akum (X,7) -- Allow no idolators to remain where Jews are strong. Choschen Ham(388,16) -- All contribute to expense of killing traitor. Pesachim (49b) -- No need of prayers while beheading on Sabbath. Schabbath (118a). -- Prayers to save from punishment of coming Messiah. In the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library, unless recently removed, you can find a copy of "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians" by the Rev. I. B. Pranaitis. A copy of the original work printed in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1892 can be made available to you by our mutual friend if you are interested in reading the above passages in the original Hebrew text with their Latin translation. I trust my summaries correctly explain the original text. I believe they do. If I am in error in any way please be so kind as to let me know. It was very difficult to reduce them to short summaries. The National Conference of Christians and Jews need not scrutinize the "63 books" of the Talmud to discover all the anti- Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christian faith passages in the books which are "THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW" and which is "THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS". They can also keep that, as Rabbi Morris Kertzer also points out, as explained earlier, that "ADULTS STUDY ANCIENT WRITINGS TOO... IN... GROUP DISCUSSION OF TALMUD BEFORE EVENING PRAYER". If the National Conference of Christians and Jews are genuinely interested in "interfaith" and "brotherhood" do you not think, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that they should compel a start at once to expunge from the Talmud the anti-Christ, anti- Christian, and anti-Christianity passages from the Talmud in the "brotherly" way they expunged passages from the New Testament? Will you ask them? Throughout the world the Oxford English Dictionary is accepted as the most authoritative and authentic source for information on the origin, definition and use of words in the English language. Authorities in all fields everywhere accept the Oxford English Dictionary brings out clearly that "Judaist" and "Judaic" are the correct forms for the improper and incorrect misused and misleading "Jews" and "Jewish". You will agree completely with the Oxford English Dictionary if you consider the matter carefully. "Judaist" and "Judaic" are correct. "Jews" and "Jewish" are incorrect. "Jew" and "Jewish" do not belong in the English language if the use of the correct words is of interest to the English-speaking peoples. The so-called or self-styled "Jews" cannot truthfully describe themselves as "Jews" because they are not in any sense "Judeans". They can correctly identify themselves by their religious belief if they so wish by identifying themselves as "Judaists". A "Judaist" is a person who professes so-called "Judaism" as his religious belief, according to the Oxford English Dictionary. The origin of "Jew" has not its roots in "Judaism" as explained. The adjective form of "Judaist" is "Judaic". "Jewish" as an adjective is just as incorrect as "Jew" is as a noun. "Jewish" has no reason to exist. Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" in English-speaking countries in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries created a wide acceptance and use for "Jewish". "Jewish" is being used today in many ways that are no less fantastic and grotesque than incorrect and inaccurate. "Jewish" is used today to describe everything from "Jewish blood", whatever that may be, to "Jewish Rye Bread", strange as that may sound. The many implications, inferences and innuendoes of "Jewish" today resulting from its commercial uses beggar description. At the 1954 annual meeting of the St. Paul Guild in the Plaza Hotel in New York City before more than 1000 Catholics, a Roman Catholic priest who was the main speaker and the guest of honor referred to "my Jewish blood". It just happens that this priest was born a so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe and was converted to Catholicism there about 25 years ago. It seems unique that a priest who has professed Catholicism that length of time should mention "my Jewish blood" to Catholics. The radio blasts and the out-door signs blazon "Levy's Jewish Rye Bread", in the same city at the same time. Between these two extremes are countless other products and other services which advertise themselves in print, on radio and television, as "Jewish". This priest who talks to Catholics about "my Jewish blood" when he addresses audiences also refers to the "Jewish blood" of Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, to the "Jewish blood" of the Apostles, and to the "Jewish blood" of the early Christians. What he means by "my Jewish blood" mystifies those Catholics who hear him. They query "What is `Jewish blood' "? They ask what happens to "Jewish blood" when so-called or self-styled "Jews" are converted to Catholicism? And in the extreme case when a so-called or self- styled "Jew" becomes a Roman Catholic priest? How is "Jewish blood" biologically different from the blood of persons who profess other religious faiths, they ask. It is hard for me to believe that there is anything biologically different which determines characteristics typical of a specific religious belief. Are the inherent racial and national characteristics determined by religious dogma or doctrine? The word "Jewess" raises a similar question. If "Jewess" is the female for the male "Jew" I must admit that I have been unable to find female as well as male designation for persons professing any religious belief other than so-called "Judaism". Are there any other that you know? I have searched for the female of Catholicism, Protestantism, Hindu, Moslem, and others but without success. It seems very popular now to refer to Mary, Holy Mother of Jesus, as a "Jewess". It does seem unrealistic to identify the sex of members of any religious belief by appropriate designations. If the word "Jew" is regarded as descriptive of a race or a nation, as is often the case, it is equally unrealistic to indicate the sex of members of a race or a nation by a suffix used for that purpose. I know of no case in that respect except "Negress", and the Negro race strongly objects to the use of that designation, and strongly. Another word is creating more problems among Christians. I refer to "Judeo-Christian". You see it more and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history, and on good sense applied to theology, the term "Judea-Christian" presents a strange combination. Does "Judeo" refer to ancient "Pharisaism", or to "Talmudism", or to so-called "Judaism"? In view of what we know today, how can there be "Judeo-Christian" anything? Based upon what is now known "Judeo-Christian" is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is "hot-cold" , or "old-young", or "heavy-light", or that a person was "healthy-sick", or "poor-rich", or "dumb- smart", or "ignorant-educated", or "happy-sad". These words are antonyms, not synonyms. "Judeo-Christian" in the light of incontestable facts are also antonyms, not synonyms as so-called or self-styled "Jews" would like Christians to believe. More sand for Christian's eyes. An "Institute of Judeo-Christian Studies" has been established by Seton Hall University. It is actually a "one-man Institute". Father John M. Oesterreicher is the "one-man Institute". The "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" occupies a small office in a down-town office building in Newark, N. J. This "one-man Institute", according to their literature, has no faculty except Father Oesterreicher, and no students. Father Oesterreicher was born a so- called or self-styled "Jew" and became a convert to Catholicism. I have had the pleasure of hearing him talk on many occasions. Addresses by Father Oesterreicher and literature by mail are the principal activities of the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies". Father Oesterreicher also plans to publish books and circulate them throughout the world, in large quantities. Father Oesterreicher leaves no stones unturned to convince Catholics that "Judaeo-Christian" is a combination of two words that are synonyms theologically. Nothing could be further from the truth. Father Oesterreicher impresses that viewpoint upon his Catholic audiences. Father Oesterreicher talks to Catholic audiences only, so far as I am able to tell. In his addresses Father Oesterreicher impresses upon Catholics the opinion he personally holds on the question of the dependence of the Christian faith upon so-called "Judaism". His audiences depart Father Osterreicher's addresses very much confused. It would make better Catholics out of Father Oesterreicher's audiences if he would "sell" Jesus and the Catholic Church rather than try to "sell" so-called "Judaism" to his audiences. Well-planned and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled "Jews" manages to keep Christians well informed on the subject of so-called "Judaism". If Father Oesterreicher would concentrate upon "selling" Jesus and the Christian faith to audiences of so-called or self-styled "Jews" he would be doing more towards realizing the objectives of Christian effort. The activities of this "one-man Institute" are somewhat of a deep mystery. But I am certain that Monsignor McNulty will never allow the "Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies" to bring discredit upon the fine record of Seton Hall as one of the foremost Catholic universities anywhere. But it will bear watching, and Monsignor McNulty will always appreciate constructive comment. The word "anti-Semitism" is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. "Anti-Semitism" serves only one purpose today. It is used as a "smear word". When so-called or self-styled "Jews" feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victims by applying the word "anti-Semite" or "anti-Semitic" through all the channels they have at their command and under their control. I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled "Jews" were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to "smear" me as an "anti-Semite" hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say. Until 1946 I was a "little saint" to all so-called or self-styled "Jews". When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine I became suddenly "Anti-Semite No. 1". It is disgraceful to watch the Christian clergy take up the use of the word "anti-Semitism". They should know better. They know that "anti-Semitism" is a meaningless word in the sense it is used today. They know the correct word is "Judaeophobe". "Anti- Semite" was developed into the "smear-word" it is today because "Semite" is associated with Jesus in the minds of Christians. Christians are accessories in the destruction of the Christian faith by tolerating the use of the smear-word "anti-Semitic" to silence by the most intolerant forms of persecution employing that smear word Christians who oppose the evil conspirators. It no doubt grieves you as much as it grieves me, my dear Dr. Goldstein, to see our nation's moral standards sink to new all- time lows day by day. Of that there is very little doubt. The moral standards of this nation in political, economic, social and spiritual fields are the factors which determine the position we will occupy in world affairs. We will be judged on that basis from afar by the other 94% of the world's total population. Our 6% of the world's total population will succeed or fail in its efforts to retain world leadership by our moral standards because in the last analysis they influence the attitudes and activities of the nation. The moral standards are the crucible in which the nation's character is refined and molded. The end product will never be any better than the ingredients used. It is something to think about. There is much for which this Christian country can still feel very proud. But there is also much for which we cannot feel proud. A correct diagnosis of our nation's rapidly deteriorating moral standards in all walks of life will reveal the cause as the nation's current psychosis to concentrate primarily on how to (1) "make MORE money" and (2) "have MORE fun". How many persons do you personally know who include among their daily duties service and sacrifice in the defense against its enemies of that priceless birthright which is the God-given heritage of all those blessed to be born Americans? What services? What sacrifices? With very few exceptions this generation seems to regard everything as secondary to our accountability to unborn generations for our generation's breach of the faith and betrayal of our trust to posterity. The sabotage of our nation's moral standards is more incidental to the program of that inimical conspiracy than accidental in the continued march of mankind towards an easier existence. The guidance and control of this nation's place in history has gravitated by default into the hands of those persons lease worthy of that trusteeship. This notable achievement by them is their reward for their success in obtaining effective and numerous Christian "male prostitutes" to "front" for them. Too many of these efficacious Christian "male prostitutes" are scattered throughout the nation in public affairs for the security of the Christian faith and the nation's political, social and economic stability. A "male prostitute" is a male who offers the faculties of his anatomy from the neck up for hire to anyone who will pay his "asking price" exactly as the female of the same species offers the facilities of her anatomy from the neck down to anyone who will pay her "asking price". Thousands of these pseudo-Christian "male-prostitutes" circulate freely unrecognized in all walks of life proudly pandering pernicious propaganda for pecuniary profit and political power. They are the "dog in the manger". The corroding effect of their subtle intrigue is slowly but surely disintegrating the moral fiber of the nation. This danger to the Christian faith cannot be overestimated. This peril to the nation should not be under- estimated. The Christian clergy must remain alerted to it. The international "crime of crimes" of all history, that reprehensible iniquity in which this nation played the major role, was committed in Palestine almost totally as a result of the interference of the United States in that situation on behalf solely of the Zionist world-wide organization with its headquarters in New York City. The interference of the United States in that situation on behalf of the aggressors illustrates the power exerted upon the domestic and foreign policies of this government by the "male prostitutes" fearlessly functioning on behalf of the Zionist conspirators. It is the blackest page in our history. The responsibility for that un-Christian, non-Christian and anti-Christian "cause" can be honestly deposited on the door-step of the Christian clergy. They must assume the full guilt for that inhumane and unholy crime committed in the name of Christian "charity". Sunday after Sunday, year in and year out, the Christian clergy dinned into the ears of 150,000,000 Christians who go to church regularly that Christians must regard it as their "Christian duty" to support the Zionist conspiracy for the conquest of Palestine. Well, we "sowed a wind", now we will "reap a whirlwind". The 150,000,000 Christians in the United States were "high pressured" by the Christian clergy to give their unqualified support to the Zionist program to "repatriate" to their "homeland" in Palestine the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe who were the descendants of the Khazars. Christians were exhorted by the Christian clergy to regard the so-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe as God's "chosen people" and Palestine as their "Promised Land". But they knew better all the time. It was a case of cupidity not stupidity you can be sure. As a direct result of the activities of the "male prostitutes" on behalf of the Zionist program, and contrary to all international law, to justice and to equity, anything to the contrary notwithstanding, the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States, with few exceptions, demanded that the Congress of the United States use the prestige and the power of this nation, diplomatic, economic and military, to guarantee the successful outcome of the Zionist program for the conquest of Palestine. This was done and the Zionists conquered Palestine. We are responsible. It is a well-established and an undeniable historic fact that the active participation of the United States in the conquest of Palestine, on behalf of the Zionists, was the factor responsible for the conquest of Palestine by the Zionists. Without the active participation of the United States on behalf of the Zionists it is certain that the Zionists would never have attempted the conquest of Palestine by force of arms. Palestine today would be an independent sovereign country under a form of government established by self-determination of the lawful and legal Palestinians. This was aborted by the payment of countless millions of dollars to Christian "male prostitutes" by Zionists on a scale difficult for the uninitiated to even imagine. With your kind permission anticipated, I beg to respectfully and sincerely now submit to you here my comments on several passages in your latest article which appeared in the September issue of the A.P.J. Bulletin under the headline "News and Views of Jews". Deep down in my heart, my dear Dr. Goldstein, I truly feel that I can make a modest contribution towards the big success I wish you in the valuable work you are attempting, under such discouraging handicaps. My reactions to what you state in your article may prove helpful to you. My comments here were conceived in that spirit. May I suggest that you favor them with your consideration accordingly. I feel that you may be so close to the "trees" that you cannot see the "forest" in its true perspective. You may find a genuinely sincere outsider's point of view helpful to you in orienting your yesterday's attitudes to today's realities and to tomorrow's seemingly certain probabilities. I believe you will. You realize, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that all "Laws of Nature" are irrevocable. "Laws of Nature" can neither be amended, suspended or repealed regardless how we fell about them. One of these "Laws of Nature" is fundamentally the basic reason "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS", the subtitle in your article which attracted my attention. The "Law of Nature" to which I refer is the law that "TO EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTIONS." In my respectful opinion that "Law of Nature is the alpha and omega of all questions as to "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS." In your article you make this mystery sound very complicated. However, it really is very simple. The so-called or self-styled "Jews" who become Catholics today are subconsciously reacting to that "Law of Nature". The conversion to Catholicism of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" is the "EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION" of that "Law of Nature". Their conversion is a "REACTION" not an "ACTION". Can you any longer doubt that after reading these facts? Catholicism has proven itself spiritually the "EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION" of the religious worship practiced today under the name "Judaism", and prior to that name under the names "Talmudism" and "Pharisaism". What is spiritually conspicuous in Catholicism is conspicuous by its absence in so-called "Judaism". What is spiritually conspicuous in so-called "Judaism" is conspicuous by its absence in Catholicism, thank God. Anything which may be said by anyone to the contrary notwithstanding, Catholicism and so-called "Judaism" are at the opposite extremes of the spiritual spectrum. Our subconscious mind never sleeps. It remains awake all the while the conscious mind is asleep. This subconscious mind of so-called or self-styled "Jews" is "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS". The more spiritually sensitive subconscious minds of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" for 2000 years has been seeking a spiritually secure beach-head as a refuge from the terror of the Talmud. After a lifetime breathing the atmosphere of the Talmud so-called or self-styled "Jews" found Catholicism a wholesome and refreshing change of spiritual climate. They could not resist the spiritual force of the "EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION" WHICH ATTRACTED THEM TO CATHOLICISM. Catholicism supplied a sacred sanctuary for the more spiritually sensitive subconscious mind of the so-called or self- styled "Jew" seeking security in his escape from the Talmud. Before sailing into the safe port of Catholicism the subconscious mind of the more spiritually sensitive so-called or self-styled "Jews" would embark upon that voyage of their more courageous co-religionists but for one reason. They fear reprisals by their co- religionists. In your article you mention just a few of the many penalties imposed by reactionary so-called or self-styled "Jews" upon their co-religionists who become converts to Catholicism. Conversion to Catholicism has even deprived many former so-called or self-styled "Jews" from earning their living. Many families faced starvation for that reason. A convert to Catholicism must be ready and willing to suffer the economic, social and political hardships his former co- religionists will make him pay as the price for the spiritual wealth he will acquire with conversion to Catholicism. Investigation by you will convince you that so-called or self-styled "Jews" never turn spiritually to Catholicism "BECAUSE SUCH WAS THE JEWISH RELIGION: BECAUSE SUCH IS THE CATHOLIC RELIGION", as you state in your article. A so-called or self-styled "Jew" might question the wisdom of conversion from the original to a copy of the original. Inasmuch as so-called "Judaism" is a modern name for "Talmudism", and "Talmudism" is a name given to the ancient practice of "Pharisaism", how can you reconcile what you state that ". . . SUCH WAS THE JEWISH RELIGION: . . . SUCH IS THE CATHOLIC RELIGION". Several so-called or self-styled "Jews" who were recently converted to Catholicism are my personal friends. Not one of those whom I have asked became a Catholic because they felt "THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE JEWISH CHURCH GLORIFIED", as you state in your article. What "JEWISH CHURCH" they ask me? I am unable to answer. What "JEWISH CHURCH" I ask you? "Pharisaism"? "Talmudism"? Surely you would not venture the opinion that the Catholic Church is "Pharisaism" or "Talmudism" now "GLORIFIED" as Catholicism, would you? It must be quite apparent to you now that so-called or self- styled "Jews" who became converts to Catholicism do not believe that the Catholic Church, as you state in your article, "IS THE CHURCH OF JEWISH CONVERTS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS". They do not regard Jesus as a "CONVERT" to the Catholic Church. You include Jesus as a "CONVERT" to the Catholic Church, in your article. In your article you state, "FIRST CAME CHRIST, THE JEW OF JEWS". I never heard that designation before. Is it original? Nor will converted so-called or self-styled "Jews" concur at all with "THEN CAME THE APOSTLES, ALL JEWS", as you also state in your article. There is unquestionably too big an area of disagreement here to disregard the views of those who have become converts to Catholicism. Nor can these converts to Catholicism be made to believe as truth "THEN CAME THE THOUSANDS OF THE FIRST MEMBERS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, WHO WERE JEWS", as you state in your article under discussion here. My dear Dr. Goldstein, as a former so-called or self-styled "Jew" for almost half your life, when you became a convert to Catholicism did you do so for the reasons you state in your article "WHY JEWS BECOME CATHOLICS"? That would be difficult for me to believe in spite of the further statements you make in your article "IN FACT THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A CATHOLIC CHURCH WERE IT NOT FOR THE JEWS". That statement appears incredible in view of incontestable facts, but these facts may not have been available to you when you made it. If so-called or self-styled "Jews" believed what you state in your article they would undoubtedly prefer to stay put spiritually in their "JEWISH CHURCH", by which you mean no doubt so- called "Judaism". They would query why Catholics expected them to leave their "JEWISH CHURCH" to enter the Catholic Church. It might appear more logical to expect Catholics to return to the original of the Catholic Church, the "JEWISH CHURCH", or so- called "Judaism". On the basis of what you state, that would not be inconsistent. You take away my breath when you further state "CATHOLICISM WOULD NOT EXIST WERE IT NOT FOR JUDAISM". That leaves very little for me to say after writing these 62 pages of facts and comments. In a certain sense there is certain sense to what you state if you feel that the existence of so-called "Judaism", in the time of Jesus and since then, created the necessity for the existence of Catholicism. But in no sense can the Catholic Church be adjudicated the projection of "Pharisaism", "Talmudism", or so-called "Judaism". We should get together in person to go into this matter more fully. I hope you will extend that privilege to me in the not too distant future. In closing this letter I sincerely request that you bear in mind while reading this letter Galatians, 4:16, "Am I therefor become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" And to this I add, "I hope not". I hope that we shall continue to be the very best of friends. If the Christian faith is to be rescued from its dedicated enemies we must all join hands and form a "human lifeline". We must pull together, not in different directions. We must "bury the hatchet" but not in each other's heads. Looking forward with pleasant anticipation to the delight of meeting with you in person whenever you find it convenient and agreeable for yourself, and awaiting your early reply for which I take this opportunity to thank you in advance, and with best wishes for your continued good health and success, please believe me to be, Most respectfully and very sincerely, Benjamin H. Freedman The ROOT of the NEW WORLD ORDER! The Talmud: Judaism's holiest book documented and exposed UNDERSTANDING THE Difference...between the TORAH from ABOVE and the law of the MOUTH! Egypt Eritrea Eu IaHUShUA "To seek out that which was lost..." We present this Information as a Service to our readers... Its inclusion should not be construed as the Authors' or the Relays' endorsement of our Beliefs... or as our endorsement of theirs.. the Truth will stand on it's own Merit. Found at: The RCathList Home Page. (Suprise!) Download file in .txt format... Self extracting 79.2K factsar.exe. "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" Galatians 4:16 "FACTS ARE FACTS" The historic facts revealed here for the first time provide incontestable evidence that their continued suppression will prove inimical to the security of the nation, the peace of the world, the welfare of humanity, and the progress of civilization. A facsimile reproduction reprinted and typeset to meet the many requests for a copy of the letter addressed to: DR. DAVID GOLDSTEIN, LL.D., of Boston, Mass. by its author BENJAMIN H. FREEDMAN of New York City Dated October 10, 1954 DEDICATION to all men of good will of all racial origins and of all religious faiths Knowledge is a collection of facts. Wisdom is the use of knowledge. Without facts there is no knowledge. Without knowledge there is no wisdom. Facts prevent what nothing can cure. Facts are Man's best defense mechanism. Without them men fumble, falter and fail. Without them nations decline and fall. Wisdom wins wars before they start. Knowledge aborts national hostilities. Wisdom obviates racial antipathies. Knowledge effaces religious animosities. Emancipation from bigotry prefaces peace. Intolerance takes all and gives nothing. Peace rewards reciprocal respect and regard. To all Men of Good Will, "Pax Vobiscum!" - Benjamin H. Freedman THE TRUTH ABOUT KHAZARS 960 Park Ave. New York City October Tenth, 1954. SPECIAL DELIVERY Dr. David Goldstein LL.D., Astor Post Office Station, Boston, Massachusetts. My Dear Dr. Goldstein, Your very outstanding achievements as a convert to Catholicism impress me as without a comparable parallel in modern history. Your devotion to the doctrine and the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church defy any attempt at description by me only with words. Words fail me for that. As a vigorous protagonist preserving so persistently in propagating the principles of the Roman Catholic Church, -its purposes, its policies, its programs,- your dauntless determination is the inspiration for countless others who courageously seek to follow in your footsteps. In view of this fact it requires great courage for me to write to you as I am about to do. So I pray you receive this communication from me you will try to keep in mind Galatians 4:16 "Am I therefor become you enemy, because I tell you the truth?" I hope you will so favor me. It is truly a source of great pleasure and genuine gratification to greet you at long last although of necessity by correspondence. It is quite a disappointment for me to make your acquaintance in this manner. It would now afford me a far greater pleasure and a great privilege also if instead I could greet you on this occasion in person. Our very good mutual friend has for long been planning a meeting with you in person for me. I still wish to do that. I look forward with pleasant anticipation to doing this in the not too distant future at a time agreeable with you. You will discover in the contents of this long letter valid evidence for the urgency on my part to communicate with you without further delay. You will further discover this urgency reflected in the present gravity of the crisis which now jeopardizes an uninterrupted continuance of the Christian faith in its long struggle as the world's most effective spiritual and social force in the Divine mission of promoting the welfare of all mankind without regard for their diversified races, religions, and nationalities. Your most recent article coming to my attention appeared in the September issue of 'The A.P.J. Bulletin', the official publication of the organization calling themselves The Archconfraternity of Prayer for Peace and Goodwill to Israel. The headline of your article, 'News and Views of Jews', and the purpose of the organization stated in the masthead of the publication, "To Promote Interest in the Apostalate to Israel" prompts me to take Father Time by his forelock and promptly offer my comments. I beg your indulgence accordingly. It is with reluctance that I place my comments in letter form. I hesitate to do so but I find it the only expedient thing to do under the circumstances. I beg to submit them to you now without reservations of any nature for your immediate and earnest consideration. It is my very sincere wish that you accept them in the friendly spirit in which they are submitted. It is also my hope that you will give your consideration to them and favor me with your early reply in the same friendly spirit for which I thank you in advance. In the best interests of that worthy objective to which you are continuing to dedicate the years ahead as you have so diligently done for many past decades, I most respectfully and sincerely urge you to analyze and to study carefully the data submitted to you here. I suggest also that you then take whatever steps you consider appropriate and necessary as a result of your conclusions. In the invisible and intangible ideological war being waged in defense of the great Christian heritage against its dedicated enemies your positive attitude is vital to victory. Your passive attitude will make a negative contribution to the total effort. You assuredly subscribe fully to that sound and sensible sentiment that "it is better to light one candle than to sit in darkness." My solitary attempts to date "to give light to them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow" may prove no more successful with you now than they have in so many other instances where I have failed during the past thirty years. In your case I feel rather optimistic at the moment. Although not completely in vain I still live in the hope that one day on of these "candles" will burst into flame like a long smoldering spark and start a conflagration that will sweep across the nation like a prairie fire and illuminate vast new horizons for the first time. That unyielding hope is the source of the courage which aids me in my struggle against the great odds to which I am subjected for obvious reasons. It has been correctly contended for thousands of years that "In the end Truth always prevails." We all realize that Truth in action can prove itself a dynamic power of unlimited force. But alas Truth has no self-starter. Truth cannot get off dead-center unless a worthy apostle gives Truth a little push to overcome its inertia. Without that start Truth will stand still and will never arrive at its intended destination. Truth has often died aborning for that most logical reason. Your help in this respect will prove of great value. On the other hand Truth has many times been completely "blacked out" by repeating contradictory and conflicting untruths over and over again, and again, and again. The world's recent history supplies sober testimony of the dangers to civilization inherent in that technique. That form of treason to Truth is treachery to mankind. You must be very careful, my dear Dr. Goldstein, not to become unwittingly one of the many accessories before and after the fact who have appeared upon the scene of public affairs in recent years. Whether unwittingly, unwillingly or unintentionally many of history's most noted characters have misrepresented the truth to the world and they have been so believed that it puzzles our generation. As recently as 1492 the world was misrepresented as flat by all the best alleged authorities on the subject. In 1492 Christopher Columbus was able to demonstrate otherwise. There are countless similar instances in the history of the world. Whether these alleged authorities were guilty of ignorance or indifference is here beside the point. It is not important now. They were either totally ignorant of the facts or they knew the facts but chose to remain silent on the subject for reasons undisclosed by history. A duplication of this situation exists today with respect to the crisis which confronts the Christian faith. It is a vital factor today in the struggle for survival or the eventual surrender of the Christian faith to its enemies. The times in which we are living appear to be the "zero hour" for the Christian faith. As you have observed, no institution in our modern society can long survive if its structure is not from its start erected upon a foundation of Truth. The Christian faith was first erected upon a very solid foundation of Truth by its Founder. To survive it must remain so. The deterioration, the disintegration, and finally the destruction of the structure of the Christian faith today will be accelerated in direct ratio to the extent that misrepresentation and distortion of Truth become the substitutes of Truth. Truth is an absolute quality. Truth can never be relative. There can be no degrees to Truth. Truth either exists or it does not exist. To be half-true is as incredible as to be half-honest or to be half-loyal. As you have undoubtedly also learned, my dear Dr. Goldstein, in their attempt to do an "ounce" of good in one direction many well-intentioned persons do a "ton" of harm in another direction. We all learn that lesson sooner or later in life. Today finds you dedicating your unceasing efforts and your untiring energy to the task of bringing so-called or self-styled "Jews" into the Roman Catholic Church as converts. It must recall to you many times the day so many years ago when you embraced Catholicism yourself as a convert. More power to you, and the best of luck. May your efforts be rewarded with great success. Without you becoming aware of the fact, the methods you employ contribute in no small degree to dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. For each "ounce" of so- called good you accomplish by conversion of so-called or self- styled "Jews" to the Christian faith at the same time you do a "ton" of harm in another direction by diluting the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. This bold conclusion on my part is asserted by me with the firm and fair conviction that the facts will support my contention. In addition it is a well-known fact that many "counterfeit" recent conversions reveal that conversions have often proved to be but "infiltrations" by latent traitors with treasonable intentions. The attitudes you express today and your continued activity in this work require possible revision in the light of the facts submitted to you in this letter. Your present philosophy and theology on this subject seriously merit, without any delay, reconsideration on your part. What you say or write may greatly influence a "boom" or a "bust" for the Christian faith in the very near future far beyond your ability to accurately evaluate sitting in your high "white ivory tower." The Christians implicitly believe whatever you write. So do the so-called or self-styled "Jews" whom you seek to convert. This influence you wield can become a danger. I must call it to your attention. Your reaction to the facts called to your attention in this letter can prove to be one of the most crucial verdicts ever reached bearing upon the security of the Christian faith in recent centuries. In keeping with this great responsibility I sincerely commend this sentiment to you hoping that you will earnestly study the contents of this letter from its first word to its very last word. All who know you will are in the fortunate position to know how close this subject is to your heart. By your loyalty to the high ideals you have observed during the many years you have labored so valiantly on behalf of the Christian faith you have earned the admiration you enjoy. The Christian faith you chose of your own free will in the prime of life is very proud of you in more ways than as a convert. Regardless of what anyone anywhere and anytime in this whole wide world may say to the contrary, events of recent years everywhere establish beyond any question of a doubt that the Christian faith today stands with one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel figuratively speaking of course. Only those think otherwise who deliberately shut their eyes to realities or who do not chose to see even with their eyes wide open. I believe you to be too realistic to indulge yourself in the futile folly of fooling yourself. It is clear that the Christian faith today stands at the cross- roads of its destiny. The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years. The Christian faith needs loyal friends now as never before. I somehow feel that you can always be counted upon as one of its loyal friends. You cannot over-simplify the present predicament of the Christian faith. The problem it faces is too self-evident to mistake. It is in a critical situation. When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in the free world the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of its "last days." What already applies to 50% of the world's total population can shortly apply equally to 100% of the world's total population. It is highly conceivable judging from present trends. The malignant character of this malady is just as progressive as cancer. It will surely prove as fatal also unless steps are taken now to reverse its course. What is now being done toward arresting its progress or reversing its trend? My dear Dr. Goldstein, can you recall the name of the philosopher who is quoted as saying that "Nothing in this world is permanent except change?" That philosophy must be applied to the Christian faith also. The $64 question remains whether the change will be for the better or for the worse. The problem is that simple. If the present trend continues for another 37 years in the same direction and at the same rate traveled for the past 37 years the Christian faith as it is professed today by Christians will have disappeared from the face of the earth. In what form or by what instrumentality the mission of Jesus Christ will thereupon and thereafter continue to make itself manifest here on earth is as unpredictable as it is inevitable. In the existing crisis it is neither logical nor realistic to drive Christians out of the Christian "fold" in relatively large numbers for the dubious advantage to be obtained by bringing a comparatively small number of so-called or self-styled "Jews" into the Christian "fold". It is useless to try to deny the fact that today finds the Christian faith on the defense throughout the world. This realization staggers the imagination of the few Christians who understand the situation. This status of the Christian faith exists in spite of the magnificent contributions of the Christian faith to the progress of humanity and civilization for almost 2000 years. It is not my intention in this letter to expose the conspirators who are dedicating themselves to the destruction of the Christian faith nor to the nature and extent of the conspiracy itself. That exposure would fill many volumes. The history of the world for the past several centuries and current events at home and abroad confirm the existence of such a conspiracy. The world-wide network of diabolical conspirators implement this plot against the Christian faith while Christians appear to be sound asleep. The Christian clergy appear to be more ignorant or more indifferent about this conspiracy than other Christians. They seem to bury their heads in the sands of ignorance or indifference like the legendary ostrich. This ignorance or indifference on the part of the Christian clergy has dealt a blow to the Christian faith already from which it may never completely recover, if at all. It seems so sad. Christians deserve to be blessed in this crisis with a spiritual Paul Revere to ride across the nation warning Christians that their enemies are moving in on them fast. My dear Dr. Goldstein, will you volunteer to be that Paul Revere? Of equal importance to pin-pointing the enemies who are making war upon the Christian faith from the outside is the necessity to discover the forces at work inside the Christian faith which make it so vulnerable to its enemies on the outside. Applying yourself to this specific phase of the problem can prove of tremendous value in rendering ineffective the forces responsible for this dangerous state of affairs. The souls of millions of Christians who are totally unknown to you are quite uneasy about the status of the Christian faith today. The minds of countless thousands among the Christian clergy are troubled by the mysterious "pressure" from above which prevents them exercising their sound judgment in this situation. If the forces being manipulated against the Christian faith from the inside can be stopped the Christian faith will be able to stand upon its feet against its enemies as the Rock of Gibraltar. Unless this can be done soon the Christian faith appears destined to crumble and to eventually collapse. An ounce of prevention is far preferable to a pound of cure you can be sure in this situation as in all others. With all the respect due to the Christian clergy and in all humility I have an unpleasant duty to perform. I wish to go on record with you here that the Christian clergy are primarily if not solely responsible for the internal forces within the Christian faith inimical to its best interests. This conclusion on my part indicates the sum total of all the facts in my book which add up to just that. If you truly desire to be realistic and constructive you must "hew to the line and let the chips fall where they may." That is the only strategy that can save the Christian faith from a fate it does not deserve. You cannot pussy-foot with the truth any longer simply because you find that now "the truth hurts", -someone you know or like. At this late hour very little time is left in which to mend our fences if I can call it that. We are not in a position to waste any of our limited time. "Beating it around the bush" now will get us exactly nowhere. The courageous alone will endure the present crisis when all the chips are down. Figuratively and possibly literally there will be live heroes and dead cowards when the dust of this secular combat settles and not dead heroes and live cowards as sometimes occurs under other circumstances. The Christian faith today remains the only "anchor to windward" against universal barbarism. The dedicated enemies of the Christian faith have sufficiently convinced the world by this time of the savage methods they will adopt in their program to erase the Christian faith from the face of the earth. Earlier in this letter I stated that in my humble opinion the apathy of the Christian clergy might be charged with sole responsibility for the increasing dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for the Christian faith. This is the natural consequence of the confusion created by the Christian clergy in the minds of Christians concerning certain fundamentals of the Christian faith. The guilt for this confusion rests exclusively upon Christian leadership not upon Christians generally. Confusion creates doubt. Doubt creates loss of confidence. Loss of confidence creates loss of interest. As confusion grows more, and more, and more confidence grows less, and less, and less. The result is complete loss of all interest. You can hardly disagree with that, my dear Dr. Goldstein, can you? The confusion in the minds of Christians concerning fundamentals of the Christian faith is unwarranted and unjustified. It need not exist. It would not exist if the Christian clergy did not aid and abet the deceptions responsible for it. The Christian clergy may be shocked to learn that they have been aiding and abetting the dedicated enemies of the Christian faith. Many of the Christian clergy are actually their allies but may not know it. This phase of the current world-wide campaign of spiritual sabotage is the most negative factor in the defense of the Christian faith. Countless Christians standing on the sidelines in this struggle see their Christian faith "withering on the vine" and about ripe enough to "drop into the lap" of its dedicated enemies. They can do nothing about it. Their cup is made more bitter for them as they observe this unwarranted and this unjustified ignorance and indifference on the part of the Christian clergy. This apathetic attitude by the Christian clergy offers no opposition to the aggressors against the Christian faith. Retreat can only bring defeat. To obviate surrender to their dedicated enemies the Christian clergy must "about face" immediately if they expect to become the victors in the invisible and intangible ideological war now being so subversively waged against the Christian faith under their very noses. When will they wake up? If I were asked to recite in this letter the many manners in which the Christian clergy are confusing the Christian concept of the fundamentals of the Christian faith it would require volumes rather than pages to tell the whole story. Space alone compels me here to confine myself to the irreducible minimum. I will limit myself here to the most important reasons for this confusion. Brevity will of necessity limit the references cited to support the matters presented in this letter. I will do my best under the circumstances to establish the authenticity of the incontestable historical facts I call to your attention here. In my opinion the most important reason is directly related to your present activities. Your responsibility for this confusion is not lessened by your good intentions. As you have heard said so many times "Hell is paved with good intentions." The confusion your articles create is multiplied a thousand-fold by the wide publicity given to them as a result of the very high regard in which you personally are held by editors and readers across the nation, Christian and non-Christian alike. Your articles constantly are continually reprinted and quoted from coast to coast. The utterance by the Christian clergy which confuses Christians the most is the constantly repeated utterance that "Jesus was a Jew." That also appears to be your favorite theme. That misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact is uttered by the Christian clergy upon the slightest pretext. They utter it constantly, also without provocation. They appear to be "trigger happy" to utter it. They never miss an opportunity to do so. Informed intelligent Christians cannot reconcile this truly unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact by the Christian clergy with information known by them now to the contrary which comes to them from sources believed by them to be equally reliable. This poses a serious problem today for the Christian clergy. They can extricate themselves from their present predicament now only be resorting to "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth". That is the only formula by which the Christian clergy can recapture the lost confidence of Christians. As effective spiritual leaders they cannot function without this lost confidence. They should make that their first order of business. My dear Dr. Goldstein, you are a theologian of high rank and a historian of note. Of necessity you also should agree with other outstanding authorities on the subject of whether "Jesus was a Jew." These leading authorities agree today that there is no foundation in fact for the implications, inferences and the innuendoes resulting from the incorrect belief that "Jesus was a Jew". Incontestable historic facts and an abundance of other proofs establish beyond the possibility of any doubt the incredibility of the assertion so often heard today that "Jesus was a Jew". Without any fear of contradiction based upon fact the most competent and best qualified authorities all agree today that Jesus Christ was not a so-called or self-styled "Jew". They do confirm that during His lifetime Jesus was known as a "Judean" by His contemporaries and not as a "Jew", and that Jesus referred to Himself as a "Judean" and not as a "Jew". During His lifetime here on earth Jesus was referred to by contemporary historians as a "Judean" and not as a "Jew." Contemporary theologians of Jesus whose competence to pass upon this subject cannot challenge by anyone today also referred to Jesus during his lifetime here on earth as a "Judean" and not as a "Jew". Inscribed upon the Cross when Jesus was Crucified were the Latin words "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum". Pontius Pilate's mother-tongue. No one will question the fact that Pontius Pilate was well able to accurately express his own ideas in his own mother-tongue. The authorities competent to pass upon the correct translation into English of the Latin "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum" agree that it is "Jesus of Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans." There is no disagreement upon that by them. During His lifetime here on earth Jesus was not regarded by Pontius Pilate nor by the Judeans among whom He dwelt as "King of the Jews". The inscription on the Cross upon which Jesus was Crucified has been incorrectly translated into the English language only since the 18th century. Pontius Pilate was ironic and sarcastic when he ordered inscribed upon the Cross the Latin words "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum". About to be Crucified, with the approval of Pontius Pilate, Jesus was being mocked by Pontius Pilate. Pontius Pilate was well aware at that time that Jesus had been denounced, defied and denied by the Judeans who alas finally brought about His Crucifixion as related by history. Except for His few followers at that time in Judea all other Judeans abhorred Jesus and detested His teachings and the things for which He stood. That deplorable fact cannot be erased from history by time. Pontius Pilate was himself the "ruler" of the Judeans at the time he ordered inscribed upon the Cross in Latin words "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum", In English "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans". But Pontius Pilate never referred to himself as "ruler" of the Judeans. The ironic and sarcastic reference of Pontius Pilate to Jesus as "Ruler of the Judeans" can hardly be accepted as recognition by Pontius Pilate of Jesus as "Ruler of the Judeans". That is inconceivable by any interpretation. At the time of the Crucifixion of Jesus Pontius Pilate was the administrator in Judea for the Roman Empire. At that time in history the area of the Roman Empire included a part of the Middle East. As far as he was concerned officially or personally the inhabitants of Judea were "Judeans" to Pontius Pilate and not so- called "Jews" as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate and not so-called "Jews" as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate in history there was no religious, racial or national group in Judea known as "Jews" nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the world prior to that time. Pontius Pilate expressed little interest as the administrator of the Roman Empire officially or personally in the wide variety of forms of religious worship then practiced in Judea. These forms of religious worship extended from phallic worship and other forms of idolatry to the emerging spiritual philosophy of an eternal, omnipotent and invisible Divine deity, the emerging Yahve (Jehovah) concept which predated Abraham of Bible fame by approximately 2000 years. As the administrator for the Roman Empire in Judea it was the official policy of Pontius Pilate never to interfere in the spiritual affairs of the local population. Pontius Pilate's primary responsibility was the collection of taxes to be forwarded home to Rome, not the forms of religious worship practiced by the Judeans from whom those taxes were collected. As you well know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the Latin word "rex" means "ruler, leader" in English. During the lifetime of Jesus in Judea the Latin word "rex" meant only that to Judeans familiar with the Latin language. The Latin word "rex" is the Latin verb "rego, regere, rexi, rectus" in English means as you also well know "to rule, to lead". Latin was of course the official language in all the provinces administered by a local administrator of the Roman Empire. This fact accounts for the inscription on the Cross in Latin. With the invasion of the British Isles by the Anglo-Saxons, the English language substituted the Anglo-Saxon "king" for the Latin equivalent "rex" used before the Anglo-Saxon invasion. The adoption of "king" for "rex" at this late date in British history did not retroactively alter the meaning of the Latin "rex" to the Judeans in the time of Jesus. The Latin "rex" to them then meant only "ruler, leader" as it still means in Latin. Anglo-Saxon "king" was spelled differently when first used but at all times meant the same as "rex" in Latin, "leader" of a tribe. During the lifetime of Jesus it was very apparent to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was the very last Person in Judea the Judeans would select as their "ruler" or their "leader". In spite of this situation in Judea Pontius Pilate did not hesitate to order the inscription of the Cross "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum". By the wildest stretch of the imagination it is not conceivable that this sarcasm and irony by Pontius Pilate at the time of the Crucifixion was not solely mockery of Jesus by Pontius Pilate and only mockery. After this reference to "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans" the Judeans forthwith proceeded to Crucify Jesus upon that very Cross. In Latin in the lifetime of Jesus the name of the political subdivision in the Middle East known in modern history as Palestine was "Iudaea". It was then administered by Pontius Pilate as administrator for the Roman Empire of which it was then a part. The English for the Latin "Iudaea" is "Judea". English "Judean" is the adjective for the noun "Judea". The ancient native population of the subdivision in the Middle East known in modern history as Palestine was then called "Iudaeus" in Latin and "Judean" in English. Those words identified the indigenous population of Judea in the lifetime of Jesus. Who can deny that Jesus was a member of the indigenous population of Judea in His lifetime? And of course you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, in Latin the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeus" is "Iudaeorum". The English translation of the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeorum" is "of the Judeans". It is utterly impossible to give any other English translation to "Iudaeorum" than "of the Judeans". Qualified and competent theologians and historians regard as incredible any other translation into English of "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum" than "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans". You must agree that this is literally correct. At the time Pontius Pilate was ordering the "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum" inscribed upon the Cross the spiritual leaders of Judea were protesting to Pontius Pilate "not to write that Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans" but to inscribe instead that Jesus "had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans". The spiritual leaders of Judea made very strong protests to Pontius Pilate against his reference to Jesus as "Rex Iudaeorum" insisting that Pontius Pilate was not familiar with or misunderstood the status of Jesus in Judea. These protests are a matter of historical record, as you know. The spiritual leaders in Judea protested in vain with Pontius Pilate. They insisted that Jesus "had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans" but that Pontius Pilate was "not to write that Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans". For after all Pontius Pilate was a foreigner in Judea who could not understand the local situations as well as the spiritual leaders. The intricate pattern of the domestic political, social and economic cross-currents in Judea interested Pontius Pilate very little as Rome's administrator. The Gospel by John was written originally in the Greek language according to the best authorities. In the Greek original there is no equivalent for the English that Jesus "had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans". The English translation of the Greek original of the Gospel by John, XIX, 19, reads "Do not inscribe 'the monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios), but that He Himself said I am monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios)' ". "Ioudaia" is the Greek for the Latin for "basileus" in Greek. The English "ruler", or its alternative "leader", define the sense of Latin "rex" and Greek "basileus" as they were used in the Greek and Latin Gospel of John. Pontius Pilate "washed his hands" of the protests by the spiritual leaders in Judea who demanded of him that the inscription on the Cross authored by Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate very impatiently replied to their demands "What I have written, I have written." The inscription on the Cross remained what it had been, "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum", or "Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans" in English. The Latin quotations and words mentioned in this letter are verbatim quotations and the exact words which appear in the 4th century translation of the New Testament into Latin by St. Jerome. This translation is referred to as the Vulgate Edition of the New Testament. It was the first official translation of the New Testament into Latin made by the Christian Church. Since that time it has remained the official New Testament version used by the Catholic Church. The translation of the Gospel of John into Latin by St. Jerome was made from the Greek language in which the Gospel of John was originally written according to the best authorities on this subject. The English translation of the gospel by John XIX, 19, from the original text in the Greek language reads as follows, "Pilate wrote a sign and fastened it to the Cross and the writing was "Jesus the Nazarene the monarch of the Judeans' ". In the original Greek manuscript there is mention also made of the demands upon Pontius Pilate by the spiritual leaders in Judea that Pontius Pilate alter the reference on the Cross to Jesus as "Ruler of the Judeans". The Greek text of the original manuscript of the Gospel by John establishes beyond any question or doubt that the spiritual leaders in Judea at that time had protested to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was "not the ruler of the Judeans" but only "had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans". There is no factual foundation in history or theology today for the implications, inferences and innuendoes that the Greek "Ioudaios", the Latin "Iudaeus", or the English "Judean:" ever possessed a valid religious connotation. In their three respective languages these three words have only indicated a strictly topographical or geographical connotation. In their correct sense these three words in their respective languages were used to identify the members of the indigenous native population of the geographic area known as Judea in the lifetime of Jesus. During the lifetime of Jesus there was not a form of religious worship practiced in Judea or elsewhere in the known world which bore a name even remotely resembling the name of the political subdivision of the Roman Empire; i.e., "Judaism" from "Judea". No cult or sect existed by such a name. It is an incontestable fact that the word "Jew" did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew" did not exist in any language. The word "Jew" was introduced into the English for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play "The Rivals", II,i, "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew". Prior to this use of the word "Jew" in the English language by Sheridan in 1775 the word "Jew" had not become a word in the English language. Shakespeare never saw the word "Jew" as you will see. Shakespeare never used the word "Jew" in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his "Merchant of Venice", V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: "what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?". In the Latin St. Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeus" in the Gospel of John reference to the inscription on the Cross, - "Iudaeorum". It was in the 4th century that St. Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written. This translation by St. Jerome is referred to still today as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today. Jesus is referred as a so-called "Jew" for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century. Jesus is first referred to as a so-called "Jew" in the revised 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word "Jew" in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century "Jew" is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in St. Jerome's Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt. The available manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word "Jew" in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin "Iudaeus" to the English "Jew" these English forms included successively: "Gyu", "Giu", "Iu", "Iuu", "Iuw", "Ieuu", "Ieuy", "Iwe", "Iow", "Iewe", "leue", "Iue", "Ive", "lew", and then finally in the 18th century, "Jew". The many earlier English equivalents for "Jews" through the 14 centuries are "Giwis", "Giws", "Gyues", "Gywes", "Giwes", "Geus", "Iuys", "Iows", "Iouis", "Iews", and then also finally in the 18th century, "Jews". With the rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the first time in history of the greatly improved printing presses unlimited quantities of the New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century editions of the earlier 14th century first translations into the English language were then widely distributed throughout England and the English speaking world among families who had never possessed a copy of the New Testament in any language. In these 18th century editions with revisions the word "Jew" appeared for the first time in any English translations. The word "Jew" as it was used in the 18th century editions has since continued in use in all elections of the New Testament in the English language. The use of the word "Jew" thus was stabilized. As you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word "Jew" did not appear in it. The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word "Jew" did not appear in it either. The word "Jew" appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times. Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of the English word "Jew" nor did they care. They accepted the English word "Jew" as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios". How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a new English word to them. When you studied Latin in your school days you were taught that the letter "I" in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is pronounced like the letter "Y" in English when it is the first letter in words like "yes", "youth" and "yacht". The "I" in "Iudaeus" is pronounced like the "Y" in "yes", "youth", and "yacht" in English. In all the 4th century to 18th century forms for the 18th century "Jew" the letter "I" was pronounced like the English "Y" in "yes", "youth", and "yacht". The same is true of the "Gi" or the "Gy" where it was used in place of the letter "I". The present pronunciation of the word "Jew" in modern English is a development of recent times. In the English language today the "J" in "Jew" is pronounced like the "J" in the English "justice", "jolly", and "jump". This is the case only since the 18th century. Prior to the 18th century the "J" in "Jew" was pronounced exactly like the "Y" in the English "yes", "youth", and "yacht". Until the 18th century and perhaps even later than the 18th century the word "Jew" in English was pronounced like the English "you" or "hew", and the word "Jews" like "youse" or "hews". The present pronunciation of "Jew" in English is a new pronunciation acquired after the 18th century. The German language still retains the Latin original pronunciation. The German "Jude" is the German equivalent of the English "Jew". The "J" in the German "Jude" is pronounced exactly like the English "Y" in "yes", "youth", and "yacht". The German "J" is the equivalent of the Latin "I" and both are pronounced exactly like the English "Y" in "yes", "youth" and "yacht". The German "Jude" is virtually the first syllable of the Latin "Iudaeus" and is pronounced exactly like it. The German "Jude" is the German contraction and corruption of the Latin "Iudaeus" just as the English "Jew" is the contraction and corruption of the Latin "Iudaeus". The German "J" is always pronounced like the English "Y" in "yes", "youth", and "yacht" when it is the first letter of a word. The pronunciation of the "J" in German "Jude" is not an exception to the pronunciation of the "J" in German. The English language as you already know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, is largely made up of words adopted from foreign languages. After their adoption by the English language foreign words were then adapted by contracting their spelling and corrupting their foreign pronunciation to make them more easily pronounced in English from their English spelling. This process of first adopting foreign words and then adapting them by contracting their spelling and corrupting their pronunciation resulted in such new words in the English language as "cab" from the French "cabriolet" and many thousands of other words similarly from their original foreign spelling. Hundreds of others must come to your mind. By this adopting-adapting process the Latin "Iudacus" and the Greek "Ioudaios" finally emerged in the 18th century as "Jew" in the English language. The English speaking peoples struggled through 14 centuries seeking to create for the English language an English equivalent for the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios" which could be easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The English "Jew" was the resulting 18th century contracted and corrupted form of the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios". The English "Jew" is easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios" cannot be as easily pronounced in English from the Latin and Greek spelling. They were forced to coin a word. The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wyclif, or Wickliffe Edition published in 1380. In the Wyclif Edition Jesus is there mentioned as One of the "iewes". That was the 14th century English version of the Latin "Iudaeus" and was pronounced "hew-weeze", in the plural, and "iewe" pronounced "hew-wee" in the singular. In the 1380 Wyclif Edition in English the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads "Ihesus of nazareth kyng of the iewes". Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon "kyng" together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin "rex" and the Greek "basileus". The Anglo-Saxon also meant "tribal leader". In the Tyndale Edition of the New Testament in English published in 1525 Jesus was likewise described as One of the "Iewes". In the Coverdale Edition published in 1535 Jesus was also described as One of the "Iewes". In the Coverdale Edition the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads "Iesus the Nazareth, kynge of the "Iewes". In the Cranmer Edition published in 1539 Jesus was again described as One of the "Iewes". In the Geneva Edition published in 1540-1557 Jesus was also described as One of the "Iewes". In the Rheims Edition published in 1582 Jesus was described as One of the "Ievves". In the King James Edition published in 1604-1611 also known as the Authorized Version Jesus was described again as one of the "Iewes". The forms of the Latin "Iudaeus" were used which were current at the time these translations were made. The translation into English of the Gospel by John, XIX.19, from the Greek in which it was originally written reads "Do not inscribe `the monarch of the Judeans' but that He Himself said `I am monarch' ". In the original Greek manuscript the Greek "basileus" appears for "monarch" in the English and the Greek "Ioudaios" appears for "Judeans" in the English. "Ioudaia" in Greek is "Judea" in English. "Ioudaios" in Greek is "Judeans" in English. There is no reason for any confusion. My dear Dr. Goldstein, if the generally accepted understanding today of the English "Jew" and "Judean" conveyed the identical implications, inferences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no difference which of these two words was used when referring to Jesus in the New Testament or elsewhere. But the implications, inferences, and innuendoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black is from white. The word "Jew" today is never regarded as a synonym for "Judean" nor is "Judean" regarded as a synonym for "Jew". As I have explained, when the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was "Judean". However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well- financed international "pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English- speaking peoples of the world. This so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word "Jew". It is a misrepresentation. The "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew" today bears as little relation to its original and correct meaning as the "secondary meaning" today as for the word "camel" bears to the original and correct meaning of the word "camel", or the "secondary meaning" for the word "ivory" bears to the original and correct meaning of the word "ivory". The "secondary meaning" today for the word "camel" is a cigarette by that name but its original and correct meaning is a desert animal by that ancient name. The "secondary meaning" of the word "ivory" today is a piece of soap but its original and correct meaning is the tusk of a male elephant. The "secondary meaning" of words often become the generally accepted meanings of words formerly having entirely different meanings. This is accomplished by the expenditure of great amounts of money for well-planned publicity. Today if you ask for a "camel" someone will hand you a cigarette by that name. Today if you ask for a piece of "ivory" someone will hand you a piece of soap by that name. You will never receive either a desert animal or a piece of the tusk of a male elephant. That must illustrate the extent to which these "secondary meanings" are able to practically eclipse the original and correct meanings of words in the minds of the general public. The "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" today has practically totally eclipsed the original and correct meaning of the word "Jew" when it was introduced as a word in the English language. This phenomena is not uncommon. The United States Supreme Court has recognized the "secondary meaning" of words. The highest court in the land has established as basic law that "secondary meanings" can acquire priority rights to the use of any dictionary word. Well-planned and well-financed world-wide publicity through every available media by well-organized groups of so-called or self-styled "Jews" for three centuries has created a "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" which has completely "blacked out" the original and correct meaning of the word "Jew". There can be no doubt about that. There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a "Jew" as a "Judean" in the literal sense of the word. That was the correct and only meaning in the 18th century. The generally accepted "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew" today with practically no exceptions is made up of four almost universally-believed theories. These four theories are that a so- called or self-styled "Jew" is (1) a person who today professes the form of religious worship known as "Judaism", (2) a person who claims to belong to a racial group associated with the ancient Semites, (3) a person directly the descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history, (4) a person blessed by Divine intentional design with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to other racial, religious or national groups, all rolled into one. The present generally accepted "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew" is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word "Jew" today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song "Jesus was a Jew". It actually now approaches a psychosis. Countless Christians know today that they were "brain washed" by the Christian clergy on the subject "Jesus was a Jew". The resentment they feel is not yet apparent to the Christian clergy. Christians now are demanding from the Christian clergy, "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth". It is now time for the Christian clergy to tell Christians what they should have told them long ago. Of all religious groups in the world Christians appear to be the least informed of any on the subject. Have their spiritual leaders been reckless with the truth? Countless intelligent and informed Christians no longer accept unchallenged assertions by the Christian clergy that Jesus in His lifetime was a Member of a group in Judea which practiced a religious form of worship then which is today called "Judaism", or that Jesus in His lifetime here on earth was a Member of the racial group which today includes the preponderant majority of all so- called or self-styled "Jews" in the world, or that the so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today are the lineal descendants of the nation in Judea of which Jesus was a national in His lifetime here on earth, or that the cultural characteristics of so- called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today correspond with the cultural characteristics of Jesus during His lifetime here on earth and His teachings while He was here on earth for a brief stay. Christians will no longer believe that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus and the race, religion, nationality and culture of so-called or self-styled "Jews" today or their ancestors have a common origin or character. The resentment by Christians is more ominous than the Christian clergy suspect. Under existing conditions the Christian clergy will find that ignorance is not bliss, nor wisdom folly. Christians everywhere today are seeking to learn the authentic relationship between the so-called or self-styled "Jews" through-out the world today and the "Judeans" who populated "Judea" before, during and after the time of Jesus. Christians now insist that they be told correctly by the Christian clergy about the racial, religious, national and cultural background of the so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today and the basis for associating these backgrounds with the racial, religious, national and cultural background of Jesus in His lifetime in Judea. The intelligent and informed Christian are alerted to the exploded myth that the so- called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today are the direct descendants of the "Judeans" amongst whom Jesus lived during His lifetime here on earth. Christians today are also becoming more and more alerted day by day why the so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world for three centuries have spent uncounted sums of money to manufacture the fiction that the "Judeans" in the time of Jesus were "Jews" rather than "Judeans", and that "Jesus was a Jew". Christians are becoming more and more aware day by day of all the economic and political advantages accruing to the so-called or self- styled "Jews" as a direct result of their success in making Christians believe that "Jesus was a Jew" in the "secondary meaning" they have created for the 18th century word "Jew". The so-called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today represent themselves to Christians as "Jews" only in the "secondary meaning" of the word "Jew". They seek to thereby prove their kinship with Jesus. They emphasize this fiction to Christians constantly. That fable is fast fading and losing its former grip upon the imaginations of Christians. To allege that "Jesus was a Jew" in the sense that during His lifetime Jesus professed and practiced the form of religious worship known and practiced under the modern name of "Judaism" is false and fiction of the most blasphemous nature. If to be a so- called or self-styled "Jew" then or now the practice of "Judaism" was a requirement then Jesus certainly was not a so-called "Jew". Jesus abhorred and denounced the form of religious worship practiced in Judea in His lifetime and which is known and practiced today under its new name "Judaism". That religious belief was then known as "Pharisiasm". The Christian clergy learned that in their theological seminary days but they have never made any attempt to make that clear to Christians. The eminent Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, the head of The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, often referred to as "The Vatican of Judaism", in his Foreword to his First Edition of his world-famous classic "The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith", on page XXI states: "...Judaism...Pharisiasm became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name...the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered...From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered...demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement..." The celebrated Rabbi Louis Finkelstein in his great classic quoted from above traces the origin of the form of religious worship practiced today under the present name "Judaism", to its origin as "Pharisaism" in Judea in the time of Jesus. Rabbi Louis Finkelstein confirms what the eminent Rabbi Adolph Moses states in his great classic "Yahvism, and Other Discourses", in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi H.G. Enlow, published in 1903 by the Louisville Section of the Council of Jewish Women, in which Rabbi Adolph Moses, on page 1, states: "Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen...the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism...Worse still, the Jews themselves, who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism...Yet, neither in biblical nor post-biblical, neither in talmudic, nor in much later times, is the term Judaism ever heard...the Bible speaks of the religion...as "Torah Yahve", the instruction, or the moral law revealed by Yahve...in other places...as "Yirath Yahve", the fear and reverence of Yahve. These and other appellations CONTINUED FOR MANY AGES TO STAND FOR THE RELIGION...To distinguish it from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish philosophers sometimes designate it as the faith or belief of the Jews...IT WAS FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, WRITING FOR THE INSTRUCTION OF GREEKS AND ROMANS, WHO COINED THE TERM JUDAISM, in order to pit it against Hellenism...by Hellenism was understood the civilization, comprising language, poetry, religion, art, science, manners, customs, institutions, which...had spread from Greece, its original home, over vast regions of Europe, Asia and Africa...The Christians eagerly seized upon the name...the Jews themselves, who intensely detested the traitor Josephus, refrained from reading his works...HENCE THE TERM JUDAISM COINED BY JOSEPHUS REMAINED ABSOLUTELY UN- KNOWN TO THEM...IT WAS ONLY IN COMPARATIVELY RECENT TIMES, AFTER THE JEWS BECAME FAMILIAR WITH MODERN CHRISTIAN LITERATURE, THAT THEY BEGAN TO NAME THEIR RELIGION JUDAISM." (emphasis supplied). This statement by the world's two leading authorities on this subject clearly establishes beyond any question or any doubt that so-called "Judaism" was not the name of any form of religious worship practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus. The Flavius Josephus referred to in the above quotation lived in the 1st century. It was he who coined the word "Judaism" in the 1st century explicitly for the purpose recited clearly above. Religious worship known and practiced today under the name of "Judaism" by so- called or self-styled "Jews" throughout the world was known and practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus under the name "Pharisaism" according to Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, and all the other most competent and qualified recognized authorities on the subject. PART TWO: TALMUDIC PHARISAISM The ROOT of the NEW WORLD ORDER!